IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Total crock
He was part of an agreement to limit the number of senators voting. There were only 5 there!!!!

So he got to grandstand against it without really having an effect. While most others did not have to answer to their constituents on how they voted, since they did not have to vote. So they didn't show up. Almost the entire sentate was missing for this vote.

He could have demanded a quorum and stalled the vote until there was one. Then each senator would have to explain the vote some day. But he made a deal not to demand it.

He's lying scum.

He's good at it, but he's still scum.

If he really believed what he said / wrote he would have demanded a quorum.
New WTF are you talking about?
I just googled and came up with:

[link|http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/031017/80/ebgbb.html|http://uk.biz.yahoo....017/80/ebgbb.html]

Their description of the Senate vote on the $87 billion for Iraq is, The Senate then passed the bill 87-12.

That's easily a quorum...

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New Final vote was a voice vote.
[link|http://www.dailytimesonline.com/news/stories/20031106/localnews/588878.html|Here].

Republican leaders in the U.S. Senate arranged for an informal vote on the spending bill Monday evening, without keeping the customary records of how individual senators voted.

The New York Times reported that just six senators were in the Senate chamber during the voice vote, which passed the measure. Only Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., spoke up against it.


Cheers,
Scott.
New Right. Ben referred to the pre-conference Senate bill.
By itself, the Senate bill means nothing.
Alex

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." - Henry Kissinger
New Ouch
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
     Robert Byrd on the Iraq Appropriations Bill - (ben_tilly) - (7)
         WHEW! - (jb4)
         very well said/written! -NT - (slugbug)
         Total crock - (broomberg) - (4)
             WTF are you talking about? - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                 Final vote was a voice vote. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     Right. Ben referred to the pre-conference Senate bill. - (a6l6e6x)
                     Ouch -NT - (ben_tilly)

That's very funny, a fly marrying a bumblebee!
79 ms