The result is "Human Accomplishment," a systematic effort to rate and rank the likes of Aristotle, Mozart and Einstein and to describe the conditions that have allowed them to flourish.To the absurdities of 'IQ' tests and homogenized Total Learning Scores\ufffd -- someone appears to have drawn up YAN CPA numerology, perhaps assigning Beauty from 1 -- 10.000.
What an utterly pointless yet predictable pastime for the legions of Nintendo-Eloi, fondly thinking they can think: and also score 100% on a day when feeling-good-about-selves.
When Mr. Murray invokes the "Aristotelian principle" as the measure of artistic greatness--the notion that the highest human pleasures derive from appreciating complexity and refinement--he stands in the tradition of aristocracy and aristocratic connoisseurship.It may be that the man makes some useful observations about that milieu which seems to foster development of an individual's abilities (as opposed perhaps - to times of burning the outliers at the stake, just to be sure the mediocrity is not upset) - but the ludicrous idea of a reductio of 'genius' to someone's scatter-plots and numerology .. leaves little incentive for seeing what else might be going on there. (Especially in an increasingly innumerate world abutting the illiterate one.)
Was there supposed to be an Idea here?
Ashton
I mean, of course an 6.000 < Idea <= 10.000 "Idea"