IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New YALOP
Yet Another Layer of Processing.

Okay...

You could have http read the socket and send over the data over http.

But why, why would you add another layer of processing. http has to be generated... gads adds tremendous complexity without any benefit of making things more robust.

Complexity is nice, but only to a point. Me personally http was designed for one thing: a presentation transfer layer, it has lots of overhead and rides on top of TCP/IP. I akin this to electroncis... a transformer to be exact.

A transformer is used to "isolate" or to multiply or divide (Voltage or Current). Theoretically they are supposed to be 100% efficient. In the real world, they can be as good as 98% but as bad as 50%. IOW, you lose much power just by adding a layer. The part that applies here is the Isolation.

Or think of it as someone "expanding" your data, so it can travel over http. The only real help would be using an http server that compresses on the fly... of course a socket server can do that too, easier too as it doesn't have constraints placed on it by another process or service.

"More work up front" usually mean "A lot less work down the road" which is usually a ++... to the good. http (specifically IIS) is a seriously moving target... if you can STOP any changes from happening... you could go that route but even Apache (or Weblogic, or WebSphere, or Roxen etc..)are still moving the specs around and break things from time to time.

--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

No, not here, not this time...
New Agreed
The rexec (rsh, rlogin...) code should provide a speedy framework for setting up as complex a c/s system as you want.

If all that is needed is to pull results from a calculation, you could just use r-commands in the first place.
-drl
     Communication between two servers. - (admin) - (39)
         SOAP - (ChrisR) - (8)
             Right, that's what I'm trying to avoid. - (admin) - (1)
                 Welcome to my life -NT - (drewk)
             Stupid Object Asskiss Protocol -NT - (tuberculosis) - (5)
                 SOAP is one those decent ideas... - (ChrisR) - (4)
                     A decent idea? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                         Valid complaint - (ChrisR)
                         In fairness, - (Arkadiy)
                     No, she's a dog - (tuberculosis)
         Quick alphabet soup translation: - (jb4) - (2)
             Java Messaging Service - (admin) - (1)
                 Danke -NT - (jb4)
         roll own xinted service? - (deSitter)
         Just remember--anything manual can be automated - (FuManChu) - (5)
             Well, that's what I meant. - (admin)
             I lean towards sockets as well - (tjsinclair) - (3)
                 Remember there's C++ on the other end. - (admin) - (2)
                     Name one: - (folkert) - (1)
                         I'm guessing the answer will be: - (admin)
         4. CORBA connection but same objection as JMS Go with socket -NT - (boxley)
         My Gut reaction tells me: - (folkert) - (9)
             We have plenty of socket servers here already. - (admin) - (8)
                 Sockets can stream, http does not, its connectionless - (boxley) - (1)
                     HTTP 1.1 supports pipelining, FYI. -NT - (admin)
                 YALOP - (folkert) - (1)
                     Agreed - (deSitter)
                 Why not HTTP? - (tablizer) - (3)
                     Read the problem description. - (admin) - (2)
                         You didn't qualify "too much overhead" - (tablizer) - (1)
                             Packet overhead doesn't matter. - (admin)
         DECNet Mailboxes. - (pwhysall) - (2)
             AHHH! NO!!! - (deSitter) - (1)
                 Silence, heretic. - (pwhysall)
         Socket to me - (tuberculosis) - (4)
             Why the daemon: - (admin) - (3)
                 Not an answer then, but a plan of attack :) - (FuManChu) - (2)
                     Complicated political situation. - (admin) - (1)
                         You mean you're not king? - (tuberculosis)
         Tuxedo/Java Jolt? - (gdaustin)

Maybe this is what seafood will do in a thousand years.
56 ms