I'm a firm proponent of this principle whether in law or elsewhere.

The problem, of course, is that you're left with the current brain-death for a long time. The advantage is that you're not replacing it with tomorrow's brain death in one swell foop. There are clearly a great many things about current law and constitution which could be changed. Ensuring that the changes I want are the ones adopted is the problem. Stretching out the processes, given a reasonably good start, means that the process is considered, and the incremental damage is small.