Re: Checked Exceptions: A Failed Experiment

Post #118,593 by admin 9/23/03 1:41:06 PM Reply	Re: Checked Exceptions: A Failed Experiment My point was that people abuse the nature of RuntimeExceptions in order to avoid having to declare anything, so you end up with code that doesn't use checked exceptions when it "ought" to. Whether this is easier or not isn't the question; such a practice makes maintenance difficult because people generally expect code to work like Java ought to. They aren't expecting unchecked application exceptions. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #118,674 by JimWeirich 9/24/03 1:58:01 AM Reply	Re: Checked Exceptions: A Failed Experiment My point was that people abuse the nature of RuntimeExceptions in order to avoid having to declare anything, so you end up with code that doesn't use checked exceptions when it "ought" to. Hmmm ... kinda assumes that there is a time when one should used checked exceptions. In your opinion when are checked exceptions to be used, and when should they not be used? BTW, Bruce Eckel suggests using RuntimeExceptions everywhere and wrapping checked exceptions from third party code in a Runtime exception wrapper when they cross the border into your code. My approach is to simply use "throws Exception" on any method that might throw any kind of exception. I rarely care what the specific exception is. -- -- Jim Weirich jweirich@one.net [link\|http://onestepback.org\|http://onestepback.org] --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)
Post #118,686 by admin 9/24/03 8:47:41 AM Reply	Note the quotes: "ought" to. Bending the paradigm simply makes things difficult for other programmers maintaining your code, unless it is bent the same way all the time. While I personally dislike checked exceptions - at least when required all of the time; as I mentioned it's handy sometimes to remind me what might get thrown - I've also worked with people that needed such a crutch all of the time. As a result, in mixed shops of varying ability levels, I think that people ought to use checked exceptions. They're expected, and one of the keys to maintenance-friendly programming is "do what's expected". I've mentioned this [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=100013\|before], but it bears repeating: Java is a giant compromise that allows mediocre and good programmers to co-exist without killing each other. When I'm programming for/by myself, I don't use Java, for reasons including things like checked exceptions. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #118,709 by JimWeirich 9/24/03 1:15:01 PM Reply	Thanks Thanks for the clarification. That's certainly a reasonable position. In a mixed-skill shop (actually, any multi-programmer shop), I would encourage the group to establish coding standards or best practices that are reasonable and appropriate for the group. A common approach to exception handling (that addresses the checked exception issues) should be one of those practices. -- -- Jim Weirich jweirich@one.net [link\|http://onestepback.org\|http://onestepback.org] --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)

Welcome to IWETHEY!