I did notice one problem with his evidence, but I don't think it actually upsets his argument.
On the second page he quotes a huge survey of what women look for in mates. The problem is that smaller stuties of American women have shown that there is a significant disconnect between what women say they look for in partners and what they actually do.
When asked to list traits, things like humor, kindness and intellegence tend to appear at the top of the list. But when asked to pick between various videotapes of men talking about themselves, apparent wealth, physical apperance, self confidence and such where actually favored more strongly.
I don't think that upsets his overall idea though, and it plays into his comment on the third page about the problems women have selecting mates.
Jay