Expanding on what I said before...
Why should I object to the truth?
Mathematicians would be ideal for exactly the reason that Andrew said. You can readily find mathematicians who can define some theoretical test for "matches" but who have no clue what it means. And who can be convinced to adopt a meaning of "matches" which is insanely broad, without the necessary context to see how silly the answer is.
That doesn't mean that all mathematicians would be clueless on the topic. But their mathematical training is not going to give them the necessary insight to figure out what a meaningful answer is.
Cheers,
Ben
PS Glad to be back. I now have an internet connection again. But I have a bit of catching up to do...
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]