IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why?
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New Re: Why?

Erm... I guess the Gryg is either saying you're a SCO, or a mathematician.

--\r\n
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n
[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n
[link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n
\r\n
   Keep software free.     Oppose the CBDTPA.     Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
New Re: Why?
Because he says mathematicians "haven't the slightest idea what they're looking at". Surely you would know what you're looking at!

Good to see you pop up here again!
Alex

"Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something." -- last words of Pancho Villa (1877-1923)
New Expanding on what I said before...
Why should I object to the truth?

Mathematicians would be ideal for exactly the reason that Andrew said. You can readily find mathematicians who can define some theoretical test for "matches" but who have no clue what it means. And who can be convinced to adopt a meaning of "matches" which is insanely broad, without the necessary context to see how silly the answer is.

That doesn't mean that all mathematicians would be clueless on the topic. But their mathematical training is not going to give them the necessary insight to figure out what a meaningful answer is.

Cheers,
Ben

PS Glad to be back. I now have an internet connection again. But I have a bit of catching up to do...
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
     SCO, caught in a lie. - (a6l6e6x) - (13)
         We have top men working on it right now - (altmann) - (1)
             *grin* -NT - (deSitter)
         Excuse me? - (Steven A S) - (10)
             You've just put your finger on the reason . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
                 Ben Tilly would object to that characterization! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (5)
                     But they didn't hire him, did they? -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
                     Why? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                         Re: Why? - (kmself)
                         Re: Why? - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                             Expanding on what I said before... - (ben_tilly)
             Expert Programmers - (orion) - (2)
                 Thar she blows... - (folkert)
                 Programmers are Artists, Norm. I've known this for years. -NT - (static)

My other car isn't worth talking about.
127 ms