IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Internet Forum / It may not be your syntax
Post #113,621
by bbronson
8/12/03 4:37:54 PM
Reply
New It may not be your syntax
Check out [link|http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/table.html|http://www.richinsty...m/bugs/table.html]

The section on tables is near the bottom of the page. It looks like inheriting styles in tables is pretty much non-functional.

Brian Bronson
Post #113,623
by drewk
Picture of drewk
8/12/03 4:47:55 PM
Reply
New No, it's his syntax
The table inheritance bug is a different issue. The proper syntax is that the style name follows the period. Child elements are separated by a space. So for instance:
.classname{\n    padding: 2px;\n}

will set padding for any elements that are of class 'classname'. Whereas:
.classname p{\n    padding: 2px;\n}

will set padding for any <p> elements that are first-level decendants of an element that is of class 'classname', and:
p.classname{\n    padding: 2px;\n}

will set padding for any <p> elements that are of class 'classname'.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     Table element style management at table level? - (tablizer) - (6) - Aug. 12, 2003, 04:21:49 PM EDT
         Re: Table element style management at table level? - (admin) - Aug. 12, 2003, 04:26:33 PM EDT
         Child selectors are separated by a space - (FuManChu) - Aug. 12, 2003, 04:27:36 PM EDT
         You've got the declaration backwards - (drewk) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2003, 04:32:55 PM EDT
             It works! Kudos -NT - (tablizer) - Aug. 12, 2003, 05:50:14 PM EDT
         It may not be your syntax - (bbronson) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2003, 04:37:54 PM EDT
             No, it's his syntax - (drewk) - Aug. 12, 2003, 04:47:55 PM EDT

Would you like fries with that?
52 ms