That's why I said ' "we" ' not 'we'
Umm, did that make any sense? What I mean is, I know there is no monolithic "we" that unanimously voted for anything or responded to any particular poll. But politicians (have to?) act as though there is. Whatever wins the latest election or poll, even if it's only by 0.5% of the 38% who bothered to respond, they treat it as a mandate of "the people." So in that sense, "we" get exactly what "we" ask for.
We have to fight the terrorists as if there were no rules and preserve our open society as if there were no terrorists. -- [link|http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/05/opinion/BIO-FRIEDMAN.html|Thomas Friedman]