The menu bar on the left overlaps a little with the text. From looking at the source I can see how the menu bar is positioned, but I can't readily see where the main body text is moved out of the way.
Otherwise it looks pretty good.
Wade.
critique my web site
- (cforde)
- (54)
- June 27, 2003, 03:14:07 AM EDT
Mozilla 1.3b 1024x768
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (1)
- June 27, 2003, 03:36:02 AM EDT
good suggestions - thank you
-NT
- (cforde)
- June 27, 2003, 03:55:44 PM EDT
Opera 6 at 1280.
- (static)
- (4)
- June 27, 2003, 07:07:50 AM EDT
same under Phoenix 0.5 @ 1280
- (SpiceWare)
- June 27, 2003, 09:26:25 AM EDT
Re: Opera 6 at 1280.
- (cforde)
- (2)
- June 27, 2003, 03:57:48 PM EDT
Ah...
- (static)
- (1)
- June 27, 2003, 10:25:34 PM EDT
what works
- (cforde)
- June 30, 2003, 02:03:57 AM EDT
Opera 6 at 1280.
- (static)
- June 27, 2003, 07:09:13 AM EDT
It's rubbish!
- (pwhysall)
- (24)
- June 27, 2003, 07:11:05 AM EDT
Re: It's rubbish!
- (deSitter)
- (21)
- June 27, 2003, 08:34:24 AM EDT
Re: It's rubbish!
- (pwhysall)
- (20)
- June 27, 2003, 10:21:48 AM EDT
Shouldn't it be left as a browser config issue?
-NT
- (deSitter)
- (19)
- June 27, 2003, 10:22:42 AM EDT
Re: Shouldn't it be left as a browser config issue?
- (pwhysall)
- (18)
- June 27, 2003, 10:29:43 AM EDT
Umm . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (14)
- June 27, 2003, 12:02:15 PM EDT
that is what colour is for
- (cforde)
- (1)
- June 27, 2003, 03:50:40 PM EDT
Point being:
- (admin)
- June 27, 2003, 03:56:27 PM EDT
Yay colourblindness!
- (pwhysall)
- (11)
- June 28, 2003, 02:09:55 AM EDT
Those that can't see color . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (10)
- June 28, 2003, 02:14:42 AM EDT
Then set your brower to not underline links.
- (altmann)
- (9)
- June 28, 2003, 02:29:55 PM EDT
But if the HTML/CSS
- (folkert)
- (2)
- June 28, 2003, 03:17:11 PM EDT
Understood
- (altmann)
- (1)
- June 28, 2003, 03:47:54 PM EDT
Exactly!
- (jb4)
- July 2, 2003, 01:46:00 PM EDT
The browser can't turn underlines off . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (5)
- June 28, 2003, 03:49:36 PM EDT
Agreed
- (altmann)
- June 28, 2003, 03:58:59 PM EDT
Bollux
- (kmself)
- (3)
- June 28, 2003, 07:12:29 PM EDT
Oh sure . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- June 28, 2003, 11:54:23 PM EDT
Re: Oh sure . .
- (kmself)
- June 29, 2003, 01:09:11 AM EDT
And would be much more satisfying, to boot!
-NT
- (jb4)
- July 2, 2003, 01:47:39 PM EDT
Nice as a default rule.
- (tseliot)
- June 27, 2003, 12:41:10 PM EDT
Shouldn't be specified one way or the other.
- (admin)
- June 27, 2003, 03:55:23 PM EDT
Uhhh, Peter....
- (jb4)
- July 2, 2003, 01:42:23 PM EDT
high-res monitors
- (cforde)
- (1)
- June 27, 2003, 04:02:40 PM EDT
Let the user decide if it is easy to read.
- (admin)
- June 27, 2003, 04:05:12 PM EDT
Fine - nice and minimal, tasteful layout
- (deSitter)
- June 27, 2003, 08:38:52 AM EDT
Couple things
- (Silverlock)
- (13)
- June 27, 2003, 09:58:32 AM EDT
the warranty logo
- (cforde)
- June 27, 2003, 03:53:43 PM EDT
back at the ranch
- (cforde)
- (11)
- June 30, 2003, 01:37:05 AM EDT
I don't think I want to know
- (Silverlock)
- (10)
- June 30, 2003, 09:12:22 AM EDT
"Back at the farm", "the range", "the spread"... :-)
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (9)
- June 30, 2003, 09:15:47 AM EDT
OK, but I know it as something *used* on a farm
- (Silverlock)
- (8)
- June 30, 2003, 10:30:36 AM EDT
Or, "honey wagon" in Germany. :)
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- June 30, 2003, 11:48:34 AM EDT
Did you have any reason to think I didn't know that...?
- (CRConrad)
- (6)
- June 30, 2003, 02:16:44 PM EDT
Huh. I always assumed you were raised by sailors...
-NT
- (tseliot)
- (1)
- June 30, 2003, 02:32:08 PM EDT
... I was thinking Vikings or pirates or something... :-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- July 1, 2003, 12:15:52 PM EDT
Re: Did you have any reason to think I didn't know that...?
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- June 30, 2003, 02:36:57 PM EDT
Jawohl. (I cheated, can't for the life of me...
- (CRConrad)
- June 30, 2003, 02:56:08 PM EDT
Not really
- (Silverlock)
- (1)
- June 30, 2003, 03:22:31 PM EDT
Heh! :-)
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- June 30, 2003, 03:56:13 PM EDT
Fine on my Mac - Safari 1.0 @ 1024x768. Like it!
-NT
- (Meerkat)
- June 27, 2003, 10:03:04 AM EDT
Looks nice, formatted well, but...
- (folkert)
- June 27, 2003, 10:58:23 AM EDT
Safari 1152x768
- (tjsinclair)
- June 27, 2003, 02:23:20 PM EDT
Re: critique my web site
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- June 27, 2003, 03:48:53 PM EDT
photo
- (cforde)
- June 30, 2003, 03:35:45 AM EDT
Decent
- (broomberg)
- June 27, 2003, 07:21:55 PM EDT
You're typing on a device that stores trillions of pieces of data and makes billions of computations per second with the ability to grab data on almost anything from around the world in milliseconds, using electricity transmitted from hundreds of kilometers through wires on towers dozens of meters tall connected to megastructures that do things like burn coal as fast as entire trains can pull into the yard, or spin in the wind with blades the size of jumbo jets, or the like, which were delivered to their location by vehicles with computer-timed engines burning a fuel that was pumped up halfway around the world from up to half a dozen kilometers underground and locked into complex strata (through wells drilled by diamond-lined bores that can be remote-control steered as they go), shipped around the world in tankers with volumes the size of large city blocks and the height of apartment complexes, run through complex chemical processes in unimaginable quantities, distributed nationwide and sold to you at a corner store for $1.80 a gallon, which you then pay for with a little piece of microchipped plastic, if not a smartphone, which does all of the aforementioned computer stuff but in a box the size of your hand that tolerates getting beaten up in your pocket all day.
But technology never seems to advance...
