IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Did Tommy really write that? And you're quoting Pete.
No, I don't know if Tommy did write that, he said it. After enlightnment he never wrote again, at least not anything theological. The book he was writing at the time was abandoned where it sat. You can get all the cites you want by doing a Google search on "Thomas Aquinas" "nothing but straw".

Well, Pete Townshend got it elsewhere. Aleister Crowley expounded on this stuff and explained it 100 ways from Sunday back around 1900, but made no claim to being original. He extracted from ancient philosophies.

Nothing = Everything
Everything = Nothing
Zero = Infinity
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
Collapse Edited by Andrew Grygus June 22, 2003, 02:56:58 PM EDT
Re: Did Tommy really write that? And you're quoting Pete.
No, I don't know if Tommy did write that, he said it. After enlightnment he never wrote again, at least not anything theological. The book he was writing at the time was abandoned where it sat. You can get all the cites you want by doing a Google search on "Thomas Aquinas" "nothing but straw".

Well, Pete Townshend got it elsewhere. Aleister Crowley expounded on this stuff and explained it 100 ways from Sunday back around 1900, but made no claim to being original. He extracted from ancient philosophies.

Nothing = Everything
Everything = Nothing
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     Must we...? - (tseliot) - (33)
         Re: Must we...? - (deSitter) - (5)
             Nice try. - (tseliot) - (2)
                 Hmm. A couple of passages. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Always a "yes, but" :) - (tseliot)
             Sorry, I've got to. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 Well said; hadn't thought about that before. -NT - (tseliot)
         here's a take from about 45 years ago - (rcareaga)
         Omnipotent with a twisted sense of humor -NT - (boxley)
         An interesting synchronicity with your sig. - (Ashton) - (1)
             Meh. Narrow is the way. -NT - (tseliot)
         Yank chain . . . big noise! - (Andrew Grygus) - (22)
             Did Tommy really write that? And you're quoting Pete. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Re: Did Tommy really write that? And you're quoting Pete. - (Andrew Grygus)
             Synchronicity... - (admin) - (1)
                 Betcha - (Ashton)
             Question: - (tseliot) - (12)
                 Evidence? I thought we were discussing religion. - (Andrew Grygus) - (11)
                     Not necessarily - (tseliot) - (7)
                         From the viewpoint of "God is Without Limit" . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             I think I made it clear earlier in this thread... - (tseliot)
                         To speak of Reality! - (Ashton) - (4)
                             G_d exists, we see or dont see in different ways - (boxley) - (1)
                                 If you Could 'describe' - (Ashton)
                             And once again, you're doing the very thing you rail against -NT - (tseliot) - (1)
                                 Heh.. only if you imagine - (Ashton)
                     I may notice, or I may notice something different - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                         Unless you look at the smallest viable unit. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             The smallest viable unit is smaller than that... - (ben_tilly)
             'No-Thing-ness' - (Ashton) - (1)
                 Exactly - (deSitter)
             God is hard to define - (orion) - (2)
                 Re: God is hard to define - umm Really ?? - (Ashton) - (1)
                     Shine the light of truth, brother! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)

I’d love to have either one win and then lose in a recount. Nice set-up for a faction fight.
74 ms