IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New An interesting synchronicity with your sig.
Yeah, yeah.. your guys get/earn! the collective dis - maybe 'cause Each One is a Sect-of-One speaking for the Whole Corporate Org. And like the AMA, who never discipline a butcher-'doctor', so do the Christians collectively and tacitly merely roll-eyes to each other:

But never publicly slap-down the bestial-wing when it's out shootin queers, pronouncing zygotes to be Voting Citizens and.. otherwise garbling that Uniquely-Xian-Direct-celfone to the 'ears' of The UnKnowable [The Absolute].
(An 'access' which saner and more ancient groups have deemed.. about as valid as, "Your Own Personally-crafted God" cha cha cha.)

And to do That little sleight-of-Meaning, you have to commit a series of contortions:
sophistry, solecism - not to mention solipsism.
Edit, reedit, censor.
..along with Language murder of other degrees across all scales.

And then Christians, generally: dis everyone Not-You, whose Sages have expressed the Mystery of
[I Am and I Am Aware That I Am]

quite differently. And with quite more humility. *There's* the hubris that ever evokes: Opposition, as towards any other form of smarmy sanctimony - whether the SS or the ThD.

So that's why: "Christians", the whole unhomogeneous Lot of the individuals who claim Specialness: are lawful prey of those Who Know they may not Walk With God, get raptured outta the mess we made for ourselves of our chances to do better -- and smirk about Our Special Relationship with the Allied/Axis Power -- while watchin the Other Suckers get BBQed. It's too much like a teenage Guy Thing at the car races.



HTH

Ashton

Oh yeah too -

95.36% of the Christians I've ever encountered - have no knowledge of human myth-making (and the necessity for homo-saps to do this), couldn't discriminate the "truthfulness" of this or that 32nd degree hesaid-hesaid class exercise in gossip: all dumped into that Manual of revisions and omissions (like the pithy Gospel of St Thomas) yada yada.

It's the Blind stubbornly leading the blind around that Elephant. But I digress. Logic is never nearly enough.
Indra and the beautiful Blue-skinned Boy - watching columns of ants cross the Palace floor in perfect formation.
Blue Boy laughs.

Indra: Why do you laugh?
BB: Believe me, you will not wish to hear..

Indra: What are these ants? I wish to know. Teach.




BB: Former Indras All.
New Meh. Narrow is the way.

Many fears are born of stupidity and ignorance -
Which you should be feeding with rumour and generalisation.
BOfH, 2002 "Episode" 10
     Must we...? - (tseliot) - (33)
         Re: Must we...? - (deSitter) - (5)
             Nice try. - (tseliot) - (2)
                 Hmm. A couple of passages. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Always a "yes, but" :) - (tseliot)
             Sorry, I've got to. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 Well said; hadn't thought about that before. -NT - (tseliot)
         here's a take from about 45 years ago - (rcareaga)
         Omnipotent with a twisted sense of humor -NT - (boxley)
         An interesting synchronicity with your sig. - (Ashton) - (1)
             Meh. Narrow is the way. -NT - (tseliot)
         Yank chain . . . big noise! - (Andrew Grygus) - (22)
             Did Tommy really write that? And you're quoting Pete. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Re: Did Tommy really write that? And you're quoting Pete. - (Andrew Grygus)
             Synchronicity... - (admin) - (1)
                 Betcha - (Ashton)
             Question: - (tseliot) - (12)
                 Evidence? I thought we were discussing religion. - (Andrew Grygus) - (11)
                     Not necessarily - (tseliot) - (7)
                         From the viewpoint of "God is Without Limit" . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             I think I made it clear earlier in this thread... - (tseliot)
                         To speak of Reality! - (Ashton) - (4)
                             G_d exists, we see or dont see in different ways - (boxley) - (1)
                                 If you Could 'describe' - (Ashton)
                             And once again, you're doing the very thing you rail against -NT - (tseliot) - (1)
                                 Heh.. only if you imagine - (Ashton)
                     I may notice, or I may notice something different - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                         Unless you look at the smallest viable unit. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             The smallest viable unit is smaller than that... - (ben_tilly)
             'No-Thing-ness' - (Ashton) - (1)
                 Exactly - (deSitter)
             God is hard to define - (orion) - (2)
                 Re: God is hard to define - umm Really ?? - (Ashton) - (1)
                     Shine the light of truth, brother! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)

We bought the office.
94 ms