So the real answer is...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #106,347 by bepatient 6/17/03 3:19:42 PM Reply	So the real answer is... ...not unless I reconfigure the server. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #106,358 by drewk 6/17/03 4:46:32 PM Reply	That's why they close ports So you can't do that. If I remember my networking history correctly, that's the whole reason ports were created, was to enable you to decide what types of traffic to allow. === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #106,361 by bepatient 6/17/03 5:10:28 PM Reply	But why shouldn't I be able... ...to say I want to send traffic from port x here and connect to port y there? That is what I want to do...even if it isn't possible;-) If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #106,389 by tseliot 6/17/03 7:30:14 PM Reply	You are saying that. ...but your firewall admins have determined your particular connection is a no-no. My guess is they wanted to block incoming traffic on port 22, and just blocked it all because it was easier. Ask them...? Many fears are born of stupidity and ignorance - Which you should be feeding with rumour and generalisation. BOfH, 2002 "Episode" 10
Post #106,391 by pwhysall 6/17/03 7:48:19 PM Reply	man netcat Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #106,828 by ben_tilly 6/21/03 5:26:37 PM Reply	You are right about that, but unfortunately... the people who tend to need to get things running together don't tend to be the people whose job it is to make sure that bad things don't happen to the network, so the two wind up in direct conflict. The result is a slow arms race between the two groups. Cheers, Ben "good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not" - [link\|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html\|Stefano Mazzocchi]

SSH question. - (bepatient) - (10) - June 17, 2003, 02:39:14 PM EDT

I would say: - (folkert) - (7) - June 17, 2003, 02:55:25 PM EDT

Okay. - (folkert) - (6) - June 17, 2003, 03:01:21 PM EDT

So the real answer is... - (bepatient) - (5) - June 17, 2003, 03:19:42 PM EDT

That's why they close ports - (drewk) - (4) - June 17, 2003, 04:46:32 PM EDT

But why shouldn't I be able... - (bepatient) - (2) - June 17, 2003, 05:10:28 PM EDT

You are saying that. - (tseliot) - June 17, 2003, 07:30:14 PM EDT

man netcat -NT - (pwhysall) - June 17, 2003, 07:48:19 PM EDT

You are right about that, but unfortunately... - (ben_tilly) - June 21, 2003, 05:26:37 PM EDT

have the server listen on 23 or wherever - (boxley) - June 17, 2003, 03:02:07 PM EDT

Several methods - (kmself) - June 22, 2003, 01:17:25 AM EDT

iwethey.org

It's their own fault! If they wanted to break the law without consequences, they should have gone into banking.
96 ms