Come back with some real evidence...
Do you argue that Iraq did not have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon sometime in the next 5 years?
Certainly not.
I'm stating that the evidence produced so far to indicate that Iraq was attempting to produce nuclear weapons has been fabricated. Furthermore, I'm stating that I believe our administration was intent not on discovering whether or not Saddam/Iraq were intent on producing nuclear weapons but rather that they were intent on stating that Saddam/Iraq were intent on producing nuclear weapons to justify a military action.
Furthermore, if you read my link - you'd see my evidence for such a statement. (Niger uranium, aluminum tubes, etc.)
Finally - ask Dr. Hamza how long it would take a country - any country - to develop nuclear weapons given the resources. (Hint: we did it - the first one ever, from scratch - in less than 5 years.)
If not, do you argue that Sadaam in possession of a nuke is not a serious threat to the US?
Absolutely - but then I didn't claim that Saddam was in, or attempting to be in, possession of a nuclear weapon. Someone else claimed that we were in danger of finding out via a mushroom cloud.
Blah - I've said (repeatedly now) that Bush wanted to go in and made stuff up to do it. I've given my examples. All you've come up with a Scientist that says Saddam didn't have the weapons but might be able to in a couple of years. Come back with some real evidence.
