Needless to say, I agree.
However, I've read several columns so far, including [link|http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/31205.html|this one] at the Register, which frets about Safari not being able to handle 100% of all web sites correctly.
I have a couple of things to say about that:
1. If we have to wait until *any* Web browser can handle 100% of all Web sites, then we might as well settle in and have a drink, since it'll be a long wait. As I recall, there were a few sites that didn't work that well with IE, either.
2. I have yet to hit a site with the current (v74) that hasn't worked. Even if I did, Mozilla seems to do just fine as my backup.