IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Theory and Practice of Programming Forum
/
Yes, not my point
Post #101,651
by
deSitter
5/13/03 11:18:05 AM
Reply
Yes, not my point
My point was that C is syntactically capable of these kinds of weird things you might use at a very low level.
-drl
Post #101,657
by
ChrisR
5/13/03 11:27:46 AM
Reply
And my point...
... (if there's really a point to be made) is that this is even lower level than assembly language (unless you count the One Instruction Machine). More like programming ASIC's. :-)
Cringely on Refactoring
- (
tjsinclair
)
- (41)
- May 9, 2003, 11:34:40 AM EDT
He's still skirting the real issues to make his "point".
- (
admin
)
- (39)
- May 9, 2003, 11:44:55 AM EDT
Good point
- (
tjsinclair
)
- (38)
- May 9, 2003, 11:57:52 AM EDT
Do I use unit tests?
- (
admin
)
- (34)
- May 9, 2003, 12:25:32 PM EDT
Apparently my question sounded dumber than it actually was
- (
tjsinclair
)
- (33)
- May 9, 2003, 12:53:25 PM EDT
Lessons to be gleaned:
- (
admin
)
- (16)
- May 9, 2003, 01:00:45 PM EDT
Great stuff!
- (
tjsinclair
)
- (2)
- May 9, 2003, 01:09:15 PM EDT
Re: Great stuff!
- (
admin
)
- May 9, 2003, 02:04:17 PM EDT
C++ unit testing - sounds painful
- (
tuberculosis
)
- May 10, 2003, 10:16:03 PM EDT
More:
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- May 9, 2003, 02:14:49 PM EDT
Code coverage
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- May 9, 2003, 03:33:25 PM EDT
How does JUnit (and the like) deal with web pages?
- (
drewk
)
- (5)
- May 9, 2003, 02:45:32 PM EDT
Not really specific to PHP.
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- May 9, 2003, 02:50:06 PM EDT
Also from that page
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- May 9, 2003, 03:05:10 PM EDT
HttpUnit is more useful for integration testing.
- (
admin
)
- May 9, 2003, 03:08:18 PM EDT
We use PHPUnit where I work.
- (
static
)
- May 10, 2003, 12:17:17 AM EDT
I'm experimenting with testing dynamic content ...
- (
JimWeirich
)
- May 9, 2003, 05:30:28 PM EDT
Can I quote this thread?
- (
tjsinclair
)
- (4)
- May 9, 2003, 04:15:07 PM EDT
Even better:
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- May 9, 2003, 04:21:19 PM EDT
No, you can't use my comments
- (
drewk
)
- May 9, 2003, 05:10:44 PM EDT
Thanks!
- (
tjsinclair
)
- May 9, 2003, 08:43:43 PM EDT
A TDD Example
- (
JimWeirich
)
- May 9, 2003, 05:09:24 PM EDT
Ooh, he left out the ^
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (15)
- May 10, 2003, 10:01:19 PM EDT
That's just evil to the core. :-)
-NT
- (
ChrisR
)
- (1)
- May 10, 2003, 11:37:38 PM EDT
It's C++, what do you expect?
-NT
- (
tuberculosis
)
- May 11, 2003, 05:43:45 PM EDT
I would only use that if it were properly commented.
-NT
- (
static
)
- (12)
- May 12, 2003, 08:43:53 AM EDT
I'd probably never use it at all
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (11)
- May 12, 2003, 10:35:20 AM EDT
Its a cool parlor trick...
- (
jb4
)
- (10)
- May 12, 2003, 01:08:32 PM EDT
Not even really a C++ issue as such, is it?
- (
deSitter
)
- (9)
- May 12, 2003, 01:25:21 PM EDT
Its a Duff Device
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (5)
- May 12, 2003, 08:50:05 PM EDT
Yep - it's assembler in C
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- (4)
- May 12, 2003, 11:25:43 PM EDT
Most ASM Languages have a SWAP instruction.
-NT
- (
ChrisR
)
- (3)
- May 13, 2003, 12:25:46 AM EDT
Yes, not my point
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- May 13, 2003, 11:18:05 AM EDT
And my point...
- (
ChrisR
)
- May 13, 2003, 11:27:46 AM EDT
SWAP?
- (
JimWeirich
)
- May 13, 2003, 11:20:14 AM EDT
That's ANSI C?!?
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- May 14, 2003, 01:46:33 PM EDT
That's ANSI C?!? ... YES
- (
JimWeirich
)
- May 14, 2003, 01:58:08 PM EDT
Re: That's ANSI C?!?
- (
deSitter
)
- May 14, 2003, 02:22:19 PM EDT
Re: Good point
- (
JimWeirich
)
- (2)
- May 9, 2003, 03:05:12 PM EDT
Another good point
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- May 9, 2003, 03:10:26 PM EDT
Me too.
- (
static
)
- May 10, 2003, 12:19:54 AM EDT
FWIW, Squeak is undergoing a huge refactoring effort
- (
tuberculosis
)
- May 10, 2003, 10:07:09 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
This is gonna blow up - like a coeliac at a bread festival.
184 ms