(new) Windows vX.X

Computer naming schemes. - (Silverlock) - (38) - May 28, 2004, 10:05:44 AM EDT

having worked in large scale enterprises just a couple of - (boxley) - May 28, 2004, 11:30:15 AM EDT

I named them the MAC address. - (folkert) - (21) - May 28, 2004, 07:27:24 PM EDT

I like that idea. - (Silverlock) - (20) - May 28, 2004, 09:11:45 PM EDT

I don't - (deSitter) - (19) - May 29, 2004, 10:39:05 AM EDT

Agree with Ross. -NT - (jbrabeck) - May 29, 2004, 12:41:06 PM EDT

Concur. - (pwhysall) - (6) - May 29, 2004, 01:54:09 PM EDT

Which is Exactly why I used the MAC address. - (folkert) - (5) - May 29, 2004, 03:16:55 PM EDT

Seems overengineered to me., - (pwhysall) - (3) - May 29, 2004, 03:41:52 PM EDT

Yeap... - (folkert) - (2) - May 29, 2004, 05:57:25 PM EDT

My case 15k winders boxen nationwide - (boxley) - May 29, 2004, 06:42:36 PM EDT

Re: Yeap... - (pwhysall) - May 30, 2004, 03:49:01 AM EDT

O peanut, I thee sledge -NT - (deSitter) - May 29, 2004, 03:54:48 PM EDT

I never name them after users or jobs. - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - May 29, 2004, 03:04:56 PM EDT

Re: I never name them after users or jobs. - (deSitter) - May 29, 2004, 04:00:11 PM EDT

Heh. - (mmoffitt) - May 29, 2004, 04:03:44 PM EDT

Theme names - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - May 29, 2004, 04:51:32 PM EDT

I've always cautioned to be careful with names. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - May 29, 2004, 05:14:18 PM EDT

Re: I've always cautioned to be careful with names. - (deSitter) - May 30, 2004, 02:18:00 AM EDT

Sure... good reason TO use it. Thanks. - (folkert) - (2) - May 29, 2004, 03:27:01 PM EDT

Re: Sure... good reason TO use it. Thanks. - (deSitter) - (1) - May 29, 2004, 04:02:57 PM EDT

I don't want to get into a pissing war. - (folkert) - May 29, 2004, 06:00:22 PM EDT

Re: MAC address conveys no new information. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - May 29, 2004, 04:08:06 PM EDT

Sure, like FCC ID -NT - (deSitter) - May 29, 2004, 04:44:50 PM EDT

When I named computers - (orion) - May 29, 2004, 04:35:29 PM EDT

Planets, car names, table of elements, movie and book chars - (lister) - (13) - June 7, 2004, 03:45:57 PM EDT

Ineptium? -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - June 7, 2004, 03:52:02 PM EDT

I only used the real element names, no made up ones -NT - (lister) - June 7, 2004, 04:23:54 PM EDT

Dubnium? Bohrium? -NT - (drewk) - June 7, 2004, 03:54:10 PM EDT

Boron? -NT - (imric) - (9) - June 7, 2004, 04:51:59 PM EDT

DING! -NT - (lister) - June 7, 2004, 05:01:45 PM EDT

That IS "Bohrium", kinda, AFAIK: It's named for Niels Bohr. -NT - (CRConrad) - (7) - June 8, 2004, 05:35:22 AM EDT

.......... - (imric) - (6) - June 8, 2004, 06:38:28 AM EDT

This is why.... - (pwhysall) - June 8, 2004, 07:12:55 AM EDT

Re: .......... - (deSitter) - (2) - June 8, 2004, 07:20:27 AM EDT

Nononono. - (pwhysall) - June 8, 2004, 07:22:37 AM EDT

ROFL! -NT - (imric) - June 8, 2004, 09:48:38 AM EDT

Oh - then WTF is boron named for? - (CRConrad) - (1) - June 8, 2004, 08:24:28 AM EDT

But you must admit bohrium would be more dense. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 8, 2004, 07:50:06 PM EDT

Windows popup block? Rumor or fact? -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - May 26, 2004, 07:41:03 AM EDT

From Microsoft? Coming with XPSP2. - (inthane-chan) - May 26, 2004, 07:55:45 AM EDT

Rumor - (orion) - May 29, 2004, 04:26:04 PM EDT

Any recommendation for a Windows Jabber client? - (Silverlock) - (11) - May 21, 2004, 08:20:40 PM EDT

Re: Any recommendation for a Windows Jabber client? - (pwhysall) - (6) - May 21, 2004, 09:48:47 PM EDT

Grabbed it. Thanks. - (Silverlock) - (1) - May 21, 2004, 10:00:39 PM EDT

Yep. -NT - (pwhysall) - May 21, 2004, 10:14:10 PM EDT

GAIM is ported to Windows - (Arkadiy) - (3) - June 4, 2004, 12:08:49 PM EDT

Care to elaborate? - (pwhysall) - (2) - June 4, 2004, 12:09:37 PM EDT

What he said - (Yendor) - June 4, 2004, 12:31:34 PM EDT

Can't get the window to come up on messages - (Arkadiy) - June 4, 2004, 01:32:34 PM EDT

I like PSI - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - May 22, 2004, 02:01:30 AM EDT

Re: I like PSI - (pwhysall) - May 22, 2004, 02:25:46 AM EDT

WinJab was replaced by Exodus: - (CRConrad) - May 22, 2004, 05:32:57 PM EDT

debian _______________________________________ ( /me ducks ) -NT - (drewk) - May 24, 2004, 10:12:11 AM EDT

Has anybody seen this Internet Exploder problem - (Steven A S) - (25) - May 12, 2004, 04:30:59 PM EDT

Sounds like a graphics driver problem to me. Maybe? -NT - (Another Scott) - (12) - May 12, 2004, 04:32:09 PM EDT

I don't believe so - (Steven A S) - (11) - May 13, 2004, 11:57:09 AM EDT

Do that. - (inthane-chan) - (10) - May 13, 2004, 01:03:38 PM EDT

No go - (Steven A S) - (9) - May 14, 2004, 11:53:23 AM EDT

Last ditch - (inthane-chan) - (8) - May 14, 2004, 12:39:58 PM EDT

Third party drivers are not an option - (Steven A S) - (7) - May 14, 2004, 01:08:31 PM EDT

Agree - (altmann) - (6) - May 14, 2004, 04:29:06 PM EDT

Trying the brute force method - (Steven A S) - (5) - May 17, 2004, 11:13:15 AM EDT

Resolved - (Steven A S) - (4) - May 17, 2004, 03:20:28 PM EDT

Rumba, isn't that a dance, sorta like a Samba? (my bad ;-j) -NT - (jbrabeck) - May 17, 2004, 03:23:40 PM EDT

That was my second guess. :-) -NT - (ChrisR) - May 17, 2004, 03:32:48 PM EDT

Curious - MF or AS/400 Rumba? -NT - (imric) - (1) - May 17, 2004, 03:39:29 PM EDT

All we see is the Windows client -NT - (Steven A S) - May 17, 2004, 05:34:07 PM EDT

Re: Has anybody seen this Internet Exploder problem - (andread) - (11) - May 13, 2004, 12:53:37 PM EDT

WTF does Sun Java have to do with target="_blank"? -NT - (Yendor) - (10) - May 13, 2004, 02:10:34 PM EDT

If it not be Microsoft it be CRAAAAAAP? -NT - (pwhysall) - May 13, 2004, 02:29:22 PM EDT

learn to read - (andread) - (8) - May 15, 2004, 03:52:49 PM EDT

Nope. I'm not comprehension-impaired, either. - (Yendor) - (7) - May 15, 2004, 10:03:33 PM EDT

First, applets are not run in a separte program (process) - (Arkadiy) - (6) - May 17, 2004, 10:15:51 AM EDT

IE behavior for JavaScript - (ChrisR) - (3) - May 17, 2004, 10:25:45 AM EDT

Re: IE behavior for JavaScript - (Steven A S) - (2) - May 17, 2004, 10:34:38 AM EDT

Once you get into that la-la land, all bets are off -NT - (Arkadiy) - May 17, 2004, 11:04:18 AM EDT

Yes - (ben_tilly) - May 17, 2004, 02:33:36 PM EDT

Eh? - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 17, 2004, 12:29:44 PM EDT

Applets have nothing to do with java script - (Arkadiy) - May 17, 2004, 02:00:55 PM EDT

backing up printer forms? - (SpiceWare) - (3) - May 6, 2004, 10:15:57 AM EDT

Found an API - (SpiceWare) - May 6, 2004, 11:19:47 AM EDT

Thought you didn't do Windows? Too much of a chore? - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 6, 2004, 12:29:04 PM EDT

SpiceWare doesn't - (SpiceWare) - May 6, 2004, 01:36:32 PM EDT

Mozilla character encoding - (tablizer) - (2) - May 5, 2004, 09:55:24 PM EDT

Re: Mozilla character encoding - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - May 6, 2004, 12:01:48 AM EDT

"Creative Omission" - (tablizer) - May 6, 2004, 03:46:55 PM EDT

Awful performance - (bluke) - (17) - May 2, 2004, 06:58:09 AM EDT

Have you tried a daily reboot? - (jbrabeck) - (1) - May 2, 2004, 07:23:21 AM EDT

Except that when I look at memory in the Task Manager - (bluke) - May 2, 2004, 11:16:02 AM EDT

I assume you've checked the obvious - (Silverlock) - May 2, 2004, 09:23:52 AM EDT

-Xms and -Xmx settings? - (Yendor) - (1) - May 2, 2004, 11:11:05 AM EDT

Re: -Xms and -Xmx settings? - (bluke) - May 2, 2004, 11:17:50 AM EDT

Check your AV settings. - (pwhysall) - (10) - May 2, 2004, 12:12:56 PM EDT

What he said. Plus. - (folkert) - (8) - May 2, 2004, 03:06:54 PM EDT

Stop that. - (pwhysall) - (6) - May 2, 2004, 03:09:18 PM EDT

... - (folkert) - (5) - May 2, 2004, 03:55:11 PM EDT

Trolling's not big and not clever, Greg. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - May 2, 2004, 05:00:16 PM EDT

But, I still hooked a BOF* though, HUH? - (folkert) - (3) - May 2, 2004, 05:08:26 PM EDT

If that's what floats your boat. - (pwhysall) - (2) - May 2, 2004, 05:10:28 PM EDT

Ok. - (folkert) - May 2, 2004, 09:02:09 PM EDT

You mean in our excelence we do not exceed the stupidity - (boxley) - May 2, 2004, 09:06:00 PM EDT

NTFS Immune? No freak'n way . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - May 2, 2004, 03:30:20 PM EDT

Some AV's constantly scan desktop items - (FuManChu) - May 2, 2004, 03:53:55 PM EDT

And removing all traces of Java helps every machine. ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - May 2, 2004, 02:51:11 PM EDT

keeping server process alive after logout - (bluke) - (9) - April 22, 2004, 10:29:48 AM EDT

I don't think you do. - (inthane-chan) - (3) - April 22, 2004, 10:48:52 AM EDT

Isn't there a way to detach the process - (bluke) - (2) - April 22, 2004, 11:01:36 AM EDT

Not that I know of. Peter? - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 22, 2004, 11:03:27 AM EDT

RUN/DETACHED PATH_TO_PROGRAM.EXE /OUTPUT=MYLOGFILE.TXT - (pwhysall) - April 22, 2004, 11:57:44 AM EDT

Log in via RDP - (imric) - April 22, 2004, 11:35:12 AM EDT

Windows service spawns another process ... - (bluke) - (3) - May 4, 2004, 11:31:00 AM EDT

Re: Windows service spawns another process ... - (hnick) - (2) - May 4, 2004, 11:42:06 AM EDT

Is there a way for the spawning service ... - (bluke) - (1) - May 4, 2004, 12:10:42 PM EDT

Not exactly. - (hnick) - May 4, 2004, 12:29:39 PM EDT

Oh Jeez, now what? - (Andrew Grygus) - (15) - April 21, 2004, 11:53:33 PM EDT

Re: Oh Jeez, now what? - (qstephens) - (1) - April 24, 2004, 07:31:10 PM EDT

Yes, but no mailboxes get made. - (Andrew Grygus) - April 25, 2004, 02:12:20 AM EDT

Why make new users? Why not just aliases? -NT - (FuManChu) - (12) - April 24, 2004, 09:08:08 PM EDT

Well, because . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (11) - April 25, 2004, 02:17:19 AM EDT

Umm. Why not use something that works then? - (folkert) - (10) - April 25, 2004, 11:21:08 AM EDT

The problem with Exchange... - (pwhysall) - (6) - April 25, 2004, 11:40:31 AM EDT

You ever use Groupwise with the... - (folkert) - (5) - April 25, 2004, 02:17:55 PM EDT

agreed -NT - (boxley) - April 25, 2004, 02:40:58 PM EDT

OK. - (pwhysall) - (3) - April 25, 2004, 02:58:12 PM EDT

You can use Lookout as a Groupwise client now. - (folkert) - April 25, 2004, 04:09:06 PM EDT

Isn't there a server-side 'connector' - (imric) - April 25, 2004, 07:49:57 PM EDT

OT: Peter, you need to post more. I don't like being #15. -NT - (Another Scott) - April 25, 2004, 08:29:09 PM EDT

Re: Umm. Why not use something that works then? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - April 25, 2004, 09:30:24 PM EDT

'Tis very understandable. - (folkert) - April 25, 2004, 11:23:50 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - April 26, 2004, 01:04:58 AM EDT

Supporting older Windows - (orion) - (10) - April 13, 2004, 08:24:22 PM EDT

Got some vb3 disks around here somewhere - (ChrisR) - April 13, 2004, 08:26:26 PM EDT

If she's really junked and you want to set her up with new - (jake123) - (4) - April 13, 2004, 09:21:06 PM EDT

I could do that - (orion) - (3) - April 13, 2004, 11:25:14 PM EDT

Re: I could do that - (jake123) - (1) - April 13, 2004, 11:46:52 PM EDT

Thanks I did not know it was possible - (orion) - April 14, 2004, 12:15:33 AM EDT

Norm, learn to say no! - (jbrabeck) - April 14, 2004, 07:30:29 AM EDT

I asked you for those disks 2 years ago - (lincoln) - (3) - April 23, 2004, 01:11:38 PM EDT

I have a CDROM of WfWG (v3.11) -NT - (folkert) - (1) - April 23, 2004, 01:24:27 PM EDT

Heh. I got one of those too. - (mmoffitt) - April 23, 2004, 09:57:28 PM EDT

I just found a Zip disk that had them on it - (orion) - April 28, 2004, 08:00:33 PM EDT

Welcome to IWETHEY!