You've looked at your Google Dashboard, right?
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Feb. 29, 2012, 12:31:20 PM EST
Re: You've looked at your Google Dashboard, right?
- (boxley)
- Feb. 29, 2012, 01:06:37 PM EST
Silliness...
- (malraux)
- Feb. 29, 2012, 06:10:36 PM EST
nice, anyone using nortel gear?
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Feb. 14, 2012, 03:36:15 PM EST
Dropped that stuff in the 90s
-NT
- (folkert)
- Feb. 14, 2012, 05:05:06 PM EST
Ubuntu netwrok manager stopped working for wifi
- (drook)
- (32)
- Dec. 27, 2011, 07:40:25 PM EST
Re: Ubuntu netwrok manager stopped working for wifi
- (mvitale)
- (31)
- Dec. 27, 2011, 08:19:43 PM EST
Mysteriously fixed
- (drook)
- (30)
- Dec. 27, 2011, 10:29:47 PM EST
wpa_supplicant is below network-manager
- (scoenye)
- (1)
- Dec. 27, 2011, 11:58:51 PM EST
Could actually be that
- (drook)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 12:15:55 AM EST
DAMMIT! Stopped working again.
- (drook)
- (27)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 03:28:28 PM EST
Try wicd instead?
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 03:41:01 PM EST
That's not even seeing the networks
- (drook)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 04:21:28 PM EST
I'll bet it's related to this.
- (Another Scott)
- (24)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 04:44:43 PM EST
Shouldn't be. (Some things to try inside)
- (scoenye)
- (23)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 08:57:54 PM EST
Thanks for the correction.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 08:46:17 PM EST
I hate wireless...
- (folkert)
- (3)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 09:36:32 PM EST
What I tell my clients is:
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 09:44:45 PM EST
Yep. Including the peripherals.
-NT
- (scoenye)
- (1)
- Dec. 28, 2011, 11:10:02 PM EST
Even with Apple hardware!
- (folkert)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 01:18:27 AM EST
Well ...
- (drook)
- (17)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 02:59:30 PM EST
Does the problem go away with static IPs?
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 03:15:58 PM EST
DHCP is probably a red herring
- (scoenye)
- (15)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 06:58:01 PM EST
Nope, no DHCPOFFER
- (drook)
- (14)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 07:17:14 PM EST
Static IP must be on the laptop
- (scoenye)
- (13)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 08:42:23 PM EST
Doesn't even show up on the scan
- (drook)
- (12)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 09:31:42 PM EST
Did you see other networks in the area?
- (scoenye)
- (11)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 10:16:30 PM EST
Cycled the router and it connects now
- (drook)
- (10)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 10:28:58 PM EST
Glad that's sorted...
- (scoenye)
- (9)
- Dec. 29, 2011, 11:31:04 PM EST
Been thinking about flashing this one
- (drook)
- (8)
- Dec. 30, 2011, 03:21:08 PM EST
Stay away from Cisco's SOHO stuff...
- (folkert)
- (7)
- Dec. 30, 2011, 04:19:14 PM EST
Forgot to include the quote I found
- (drook)
- Dec. 30, 2011, 04:36:45 PM EST
People need to be more active in returning crap.
- (static)
- Dec. 30, 2011, 05:50:47 PM EST
There have been a lot of changes.
- (hnick)
- (4)
- Dec. 31, 2011, 08:20:56 AM EST
Ripe market for "Apple-fying"
- (drook)
- (3)
- Dec. 31, 2011, 01:08:00 PM EST
I'd agree with that.
- (hnick)
- Dec. 31, 2011, 02:09:10 PM EST
WiFi protected setup?
- (scoenye)
- (1)
- Jan. 1, 2012, 12:00:07 AM EST
That's worse than WEP.
- (static)
- Jan. 1, 2012, 01:50:40 AM EST
I don't understand what this is saying about links
- (drook)
- (9)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 07:52:01 PM EST
"For best performance, don't hit remote sites." Perhaps?
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 08:10:40 PM EST
"When linking to local resources"
- (drook)
- (1)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 08:18:30 PM EST
No doubt it's worded very poorly.
- (Another Scott)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 08:27:40 PM EST
Have to test it...
- (malraux)
- (1)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 08:30:48 PM EST
I'd go with ^^^HIS EXPLANATION
-NT
- (folkert)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 10:12:07 PM EST
Someone is simply wrong.
- (static)
- (1)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 09:06:47 PM EST
That's what I suspected
- (drook)
- Dec. 26, 2011, 09:42:04 PM EST
I can see only one obscure case where that is true
- (jay)
- (1)
- Dec. 27, 2011, 10:29:27 AM EST
Okay, that makes sense
- (drook)
- Dec. 27, 2011, 10:35:04 AM EST
DNS servers altered
- (mvitale)
- (5)
- Dec. 1, 2011, 06:58:39 AM EST
I can't see the site
- (drook)
- (2)
- Dec. 1, 2011, 09:38:25 AM EST
Site? What site?
- (crazy)
- Dec. 1, 2011, 09:42:50 AM EST
And now you know why.
- (malraux)
- Dec. 1, 2011, 09:49:56 AM EST
Re: DNS servers altered
- (folkert)
- (1)
- Dec. 1, 2011, 10:43:16 AM EST
I weep for my lost $6.
- (mvitale)
- Dec. 1, 2011, 05:21:05 PM EST
Tor
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Nov. 22, 2011, 08:01:27 PM EST
Been there...
- (folkert)
- Nov. 22, 2011, 08:21:29 PM EST
Is this htaccess tip wrong?
- (drook)
- (16)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 04:22:10 PM EDT
working as designed
-NT
- (boxley)
- (5)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 06:50:27 PM EDT
But I *want* people to see the sitemap
- (drook)
- (4)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 09:01:16 PM EDT
no, they are deliberately doing an open loop
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 10:07:59 PM EDT
Why would you do that?
-NT
- (drook)
- (2)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 11:09:21 PM EDT
Looks like a honeypot for bad bots.
-NT
- (static)
- (1)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 11:12:51 PM EDT
But how do the *good* bots get it?
-NT
- (drook)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 11:31:51 PM EDT
Re: Is this htaccess tip wrong?
- (folkert)
- (9)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 09:10:31 PM EDT
So if this *is* on the machine the sitemap is on ...
- (drook)
- (8)
- Nov. 3, 2011, 11:09:56 PM EDT
Correct! Unless...
- (folkert)
- (7)
- Nov. 4, 2011, 08:08:07 PM EDT
How 'bout this?
- (drook)
- (6)
- Nov. 4, 2011, 10:25:55 PM EDT
??
- (boxley)
- (5)
- Nov. 4, 2011, 10:59:47 PM EDT
One, that's the point
- (drook)
- (4)
- Nov. 4, 2011, 11:12:47 PM EDT
Ummm...
- (folkert)
- (3)
- Nov. 5, 2011, 12:19:25 AM EDT
And just so we understand the numbers involved here...
- (folkert)
- (2)
- Nov. 5, 2011, 12:46:06 AM EDT
Okay
- (drook)
- (1)
- Nov. 5, 2011, 03:31:33 AM EDT
Sitemaps are known to be in the proper place...
- (folkert)
- Nov. 5, 2011, 01:02:48 PM EDT
DNS questions
- (crazy)
- (2)
- Oct. 20, 2011, 07:15:16 AM EDT
Depends on the ISP and Comcast
- (scoenye)
- (1)
- Oct. 20, 2011, 07:50:51 AM EDT
Got it, it's a business line
- (crazy)
- Oct. 20, 2011, 08:14:20 AM EDT