(new) Networking

Upgraded firmware on my wireless boxes. Seems better. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2004, 10:08:56 PM EST

Either that or... - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2004, 10:31:24 PM EST

! It's the Misses'. She'd string me up. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 13, 2004, 10:52:11 PM EST

DI-624 - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:35:44 PM EST

D-Link? - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:48:39 PM EST

Work with access point, not all in one unit. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 04:00:06 PM EST

Re: DI-624 - (Steve Lowe) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:58:13 PM EST

Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 9, 2004, 11:05:07 AM EST

Need Novell Help. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Oct. 27, 2004, 05:56:21 PM EDT

I recommend "Moby Dick" and "The Jungle" -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 27, 2004, 08:28:13 PM EDT

Is your question like any of these: - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Oct. 27, 2004, 08:41:45 PM EDT

Exactly where I was gonna send him. -NT - (folkert) - Oct. 27, 2004, 08:49:15 PM EDT

Thanks.At first glance, it looks like DSMaint might work. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 28, 2004, 09:06:35 AM EDT

first you buy AD /me dux -NT - (daemon) - Oct. 27, 2004, 09:30:30 PM EDT

HMMM. Very interesting. (Why yur less, man a ger!) - (folkert) - (3) - Oct. 19, 2004, 07:21:28 PM EDT

rather have the following - (daemon) - (2) - Oct. 19, 2004, 11:09:09 PM EDT

Color me a shell shocked omlete with burnt bacon and toast. - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 19, 2004, 11:55:08 PM EDT

Re: Color me a shell shocked omlete with burnt bacon and toa - (daemon) - Oct. 20, 2004, 03:19:54 PM EDT

Anyone got Kerberos working to auth Apache to W2K3? - (drewk) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2004, 04:08:07 PM EDT

What version of Kerberos? - (folkert) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2004, 02:07:07 PM EDT

AD is already working on the command line - (drewk) - Sept. 28, 2004, 04:09:23 PM EDT

Recommendations for EIM? - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Sept. 28, 2004, 01:10:37 PM EDT

Re: Recommendations for EIM? - (pwhysall) - (7) - Sept. 28, 2004, 01:14:00 PM EDT

Prolly. :) "Enterprise Identity Management". -NT - (mmoffitt) - (6) - Sept. 28, 2004, 01:29:49 PM EDT

/me flees -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Sept. 28, 2004, 01:36:35 PM EDT

You Brits, cut-and-run at the first sign of trouble ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2004, 02:37:31 PM EDT

Hey, I don't *have* to get involved with this shee. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2004, 03:07:40 PM EDT

Yeah, unfortunately.... -NT - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 28, 2004, 05:37:13 PM EDT

NCC 1701 was the first one in the original series - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2004, 02:50:08 PM EDT

Wrong - (Steven A S) - Sept. 28, 2004, 04:06:38 PM EDT

No, but Novell is the answer. :) - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2004, 04:37:03 PM EDT

And it WORKS too. - (folkert) - Sept. 28, 2004, 04:50:12 PM EDT

Safe NetBEUI - (deSitter) - (2) - Sept. 2, 2004, 06:48:25 PM EDT

By secure, do you mean safe from intruders? - (static) - (1) - Sept. 2, 2004, 08:25:33 PM EDT

That's what I needed thanks -NT - (deSitter) - Sept. 2, 2004, 09:02:56 PM EDT

FTP - recover from a mistaken ASCII mode transfer? - (Meerkat) - (7) - Sept. 1, 2004, 09:12:24 PM EDT

sorry! - (deSitter) - (6) - Sept. 1, 2004, 09:39:18 PM EDT

Ta - I think they used Reflection's FTP client. - (Meerkat) - (5) - Sept. 1, 2004, 10:12:31 PM EDT

Might be, not sure. - (broomberg) - (4) - Sept. 1, 2004, 11:03:13 PM EDT

Senses EOF - (deSitter) - (3) - Sept. 1, 2004, 11:04:04 PM EDT

That's it exactly. - (Meerkat) - (2) - Sept. 2, 2004, 12:27:40 AM EDT

($your_script)! - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 2, 2004, 02:01:24 AM EDT

Not sure it'd need every possible combination - (Meerkat) - Sept. 2, 2004, 02:21:44 AM EDT

networking philosophy - (dabox) - (8) - Aug. 25, 2004, 09:58:56 PM EDT

Should? Maybe. - (broomberg) - Aug. 25, 2004, 10:46:47 PM EDT

Since broom took the PHB side... - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 26, 2004, 09:46:04 AM EDT

Ditto - (broomberg) - Aug. 26, 2004, 10:18:15 AM EDT

What is the problem? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Aug. 26, 2004, 11:38:15 AM EDT

That's what I thought - (drewk) - (3) - Aug. 26, 2004, 12:11:11 PM EDT

Use the source, Drook. -NT - (Yendor) - Aug. 26, 2004, 12:58:41 PM EDT

It has worked for me - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 26, 2004, 03:00:07 PM EDT

Speaking of which - (broomberg) - Aug. 26, 2004, 07:33:00 PM EDT

Any way to capture mail from a particular server? - (drewk) - (8) - Aug. 18, 2004, 09:22:59 AM EDT

Doesn't a .forward file do what you want? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 18, 2004, 12:02:09 PM EDT

Not mail *to* the box, mail *from* the box - (drewk) - Aug. 18, 2004, 12:41:55 PM EDT

.forward uses pipe to redirect as well -NT - (folkert) - Aug. 18, 2004, 01:19:56 PM EDT

Make that the responsibility of the programmer - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Aug. 18, 2004, 05:26:01 PM EDT

1, I disagree; 2, we've got a way - (drewk) - (3) - Aug. 18, 2004, 05:34:37 PM EDT

Can't you just... - (Steven A S) - (2) - Aug. 19, 2004, 02:37:32 PM EDT

s/SNMP/SMTP/ :-) -NT - (pwhysall) - Aug. 19, 2004, 01:28:53 PM EDT

That's what I thought - (drewk) - Aug. 19, 2004, 02:11:12 PM EDT

Welcome to IWETHEY!