I don't get your rationale
- (tuberculosis)
- (10)
- March 19, 2004, 05:29:42 PM EST
It's not about untrusted users
- (drewk)
- (1)
- March 19, 2004, 08:41:38 PM EST
Who deletes?
- (tuberculosis)
- March 19, 2004, 10:46:02 PM EST
Protect the data
- (ChrisR)
- (7)
- March 19, 2004, 08:48:08 PM EST
Logins
- (tuberculosis)
- (6)
- March 19, 2004, 10:49:39 PM EST
our app is role based as well
- (boxley)
- March 19, 2004, 11:08:56 PM EST
I found it interesting that Oracle Apps
- (ChrisR)
- (4)
- March 19, 2004, 11:15:55 PM EST
Well put.
- (mmoffitt)
- March 20, 2004, 08:41:48 AM EST
Re: I found it interesting that Oracle Apps
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- March 20, 2004, 09:39:42 AM EST
Too flexible
- (broomberg)
- March 21, 2004, 01:22:19 AM EST
Agree about making the db able to defend itself.
- (tuberculosis)
- March 20, 2004, 10:41:25 PM EST
Damsel in distress!
- (acagle)
- (11)
- March 19, 2004, 01:02:38 PM EST
I assume a repair has been done?
- (ChrisR)
- (3)
- March 19, 2004, 01:07:41 PM EST
Dunno. But I have an update.
- (acagle)
- (2)
- March 19, 2004, 01:32:06 PM EST
Depends on the kind of a lock
- (ChrisR)
- March 19, 2004, 03:31:15 PM EST
That 'something' is the developer.
- (FuManChu)
- March 19, 2004, 05:02:59 PM EST
Need more detail
- (JayMehaffey)
- (4)
- March 19, 2004, 01:36:11 PM EST
That'd be my guess and GACK.
- (mmoffitt)
- (2)
- March 19, 2004, 01:47:04 PM EST
You'd be suprised
- (JayMehaffey)
- (1)
- March 19, 2004, 03:38:04 PM EST
I've seen some of the very same stuff.
- (mmoffitt)
- March 19, 2004, 04:42:48 PM EST
Re: Need more detail
- (acagle)
- March 19, 2004, 02:01:43 PM EST
Does filesystem say .mdb file is writeable for all users?
-NT
- (bbronson)
- March 19, 2004, 06:06:57 PM EST
Re: Damsel in distress!
- (qstephens)
- April 9, 2004, 02:36:07 PM EDT
OpenRecordset in Access.
- (acagle)
- (13)
- March 12, 2004, 05:14:04 PM EST
Join the tables and only select from one of them
-NT
- (ben_tilly)
- (6)
- March 12, 2004, 05:16:25 PM EST
Re: Join the tables and only select from one of them
- (acagle)
- March 12, 2004, 05:21:43 PM EST
Re: Join the tables and only select from one of them
- (acagle)
- (4)
- March 12, 2004, 05:32:18 PM EST
I can't figure that strategy out.
- (FuManChu)
- (3)
- March 12, 2004, 07:01:31 PM EST
I think
- (mmoffitt)
- (2)
- March 12, 2004, 07:30:36 PM EST
Ya, that's it.
- (acagle)
- (1)
- March 15, 2004, 06:08:48 PM EST
Cut and paste is a known killer! :)
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- March 15, 2004, 09:31:13 PM EST
Bookmarks?
- (altmann)
- March 12, 2004, 05:42:06 PM EST
'Nother question.
- (acagle)
- (4)
- March 18, 2004, 06:01:29 PM EST
Oooh, fun :-)
- (ben_tilly)
- March 18, 2004, 06:24:13 PM EST
SELECT DISTINCT or a GROUP BY
-NT
- (ChrisR)
- (1)
- March 18, 2004, 07:46:02 PM EST
In access, I think its Select DistinctRow
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- March 19, 2004, 11:06:48 AM EST
Make and examine a "Find Duplicates" Query
- (FuManChu)
- March 19, 2004, 12:20:32 PM EST
postgres 'perform' vs 'select'
- (tuberculosis)
- (3)
- March 3, 2004, 10:53:42 AM EST
Perform is plpgsql, select is SQL
- (admin)
- (2)
- March 3, 2004, 02:14:21 PM EST
Is there no equivalent to void function then?
- (tuberculosis)
- (1)
- March 3, 2004, 03:23:03 PM EST
Er.... yeah.
- (admin)
- March 3, 2004, 04:01:22 PM EST
I'm playing with Access
- (Nightowl)
- (13)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:47 PM EST
Number format?
- (deSitter)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 03:02:27 PM EST
data type
- (Steve Lowe)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 03:05:22 PM EST
What Steve said
- (ben_tilly)
- (6)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 03:12:24 PM EST
Data Types
- (Nightowl)
- (5)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 03:59:25 PM EST
Date is closer to number than to text.
- (CRConrad)
- (4)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 05:04:04 PM EST
Re: Date is closer to number than to text.
- (Nightowl)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 05:36:45 PM EST
Okay, I got out the really technical book
- (Nightowl)
- (2)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 05:48:50 PM EST
Stupid Book
- (Nightowl)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 06:01:08 PM EST
Re: Stupid Book
- (rickw)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 06:16:00 PM EST
My aggregate reply
- (rickw)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 06:08:29 PM EST
Re: My aggregate reply
- (Nightowl)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 08:46:15 PM EST
Solved it!
- (Nightowl)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 08:27:56 PM EST
You could have entered a date
- (orion)
- March 2, 2004, 05:24:35 PM EST
And there is joy in Finland for Swedes of German descent. :)
- (a6l6e6x)
- (2)
- Feb. 23, 2004, 10:14:00 PM EST
Indeed there is! :-)
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- Feb. 24, 2004, 06:30:21 AM EST
Both users are apparently satisfied with the new release :p
-NT
- (pwhysall)
- Feb. 26, 2004, 08:14:59 AM EST
#*%&*& Oracle exp utility
- (tuberculosis)
- (6)
- Feb. 15, 2004, 11:48:29 AM EST
Can you show me the EXACT error?
- (broomberg)
- (3)
- Feb. 15, 2004, 03:56:02 PM EST
I'll have to reproduce it tomorrow
- (tuberculosis)
- (2)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 12:36:48 AM EST
A workaround of sorts, If all else fails,
- (Meerkat)
- (1)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 01:35:37 AM EST
I'm gradually coming around to that
- (tuberculosis)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 11:09:20 AM EST
If that's EXACT command, you forgot "TRANSPORT_TABLESPACE=Y"
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 04:42:44 AM EST
That musta been it
- (tuberculosis)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 01:06:56 PM EST
And now for something completely different. . . . .
- (acagle)
- (4)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 12:25:14 PM EST
What's the destination for the data?
- (a6l6e6x)
- (1)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 01:11:51 PM EST
Re: What's the destination for the data?
- (acagle)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 01:24:31 PM EST
You're screwed, AFAIK.
- (pwhysall)
- (1)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 01:30:15 PM EST
Ya.
- (acagle)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 02:03:28 PM EST
Passing Null values.
- (acagle)
- (5)
- Feb. 10, 2004, 05:32:49 PM EST
Variant
- (JayMehaffey)
- (4)
- Feb. 10, 2004, 05:50:35 PM EST
Re: Variant
- (acagle)
- (3)
- Feb. 10, 2004, 06:00:29 PM EST
Access is notorious for that
- (JayMehaffey)
- (2)
- Feb. 10, 2004, 06:47:57 PM EST
Also note:
- (acagle)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 03:39:11 PM EST
Who will ever need more than 640K? Er, I mean 64K...
-NT
- (Arkadiy)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 02:29:32 PM EST