Robertson gives Redmond the finger.
- (Steve Lowe)
- (1)
- Feb. 18, 2004, 02:51:15 AM EST
OMFG that's good (17.5k image enclosed)
- (drewk)
- Feb. 18, 2004, 11:21:45 AM EST
Where's Bill this week?
- (tuberculosis)
- (3)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 07:24:13 PM EST
My Dad saw him in Cancun...
- (imric)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 09:31:14 PM EST
Re: Where's Bill this week?
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 09:36:07 PM EST
He IS one of those...
- (CRConrad)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 02:40:25 AM EST
Wife heard this on news in Australia today
- (dmarker)
- (27)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 06:36:15 AM EST
Re: Wife heard this on news in Australia today
- (deSitter)
- (17)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 09:38:33 AM EST
'cuz software ain't killed nobody ---- yet
-NT
- (jbrabeck)
- (16)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 09:40:41 AM EST
That we know of.
-NT
- (Silverlock)
- (2)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 09:58:34 AM EST
we know of a few
- (cforde)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 12:46:19 PM EST
But how many, highly publicized with blame laid at MS feet?
-NT
- (jbrabeck)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 10:01:35 AM EST
Fly by wire disorientation
- (deSitter)
- (12)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 11:01:45 AM EST
Um, link?
- (mmoffitt)
- (11)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 02:46:43 PM EST
Try
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 06:29:42 PM EST
Thanks.
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 09:18:04 AM EST
Re: Um, link?
- (deSitter)
- (8)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 09:32:42 PM EST
That wasn't software.
- (mmoffitt)
- (7)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 09:22:51 AM EST
Re: That wasn't software.
- (deSitter)
- (6)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 10:22:04 AM EST
As Todd noted.
- (mmoffitt)
- (5)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 02:01:27 PM EST
Re: As Todd noted.
- (deSitter)
- (4)
- Feb. 17, 2004, 11:47:15 PM EST
Yes, to me this particular 'test' seems as basic as it gets.
- (Ashton)
- (3)
- Feb. 18, 2004, 05:40:42 AM EST
Re: Yes, to me this particular 'test' seems as basic as it g
- (deSitter)
- Feb. 18, 2004, 06:18:16 AM EST
Flying Dumbth.
- (mmoffitt)
- (1)
- Feb. 18, 2004, 10:12:12 AM EST
Re: Flying Dumbth.
- (deSitter)
- Feb. 18, 2004, 10:16:22 PM EST
MS patch
- (andread)
- (6)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 11:00:09 AM EST
Nope...
- (folkert)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 11:41:56 AM EST
$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill$hill!
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 01:34:46 PM EST
Odd that some guys here don't understand the conditional
-NT
- (andread)
- Feb. 13, 2004, 10:31:28 AM EST
IYO does this justify the 6 months?
- (rickw)
- (1)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 11:59:24 AM EST
oops, dupe post
-NT
- (rickw)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 12:00:17 PM EST
IYO does this justify the 6 months?
- (rickw)
- Feb. 16, 2004, 11:59:30 AM EST
That article was in the Los Angeles Times . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 11:19:06 AM EST
Re: Was repeated on morning news just now
- (dmarker)
- Feb. 12, 2004, 02:43:38 PM EST
Lindows can still use its name
- (admin)
- (1)
- Feb. 11, 2004, 10:15:24 AM EST
Re: Lindows can still use its name
- (a6l6e6x)
- Feb. 11, 2004, 12:30:18 PM EST
Satan cozies up to the Evil Empire
- (tuberculosis)
- (5)
- Feb. 9, 2004, 05:51:35 PM EST
When it's shown not to work,
- (Arkadiy)
- Feb. 9, 2004, 06:08:46 PM EST
That'll teach Mr Jobs to say bad things abour Mr Eisner...
-NT
- (Meerkat)
- (3)
- Feb. 9, 2004, 08:28:21 PM EST
get that into the LRPD stack now !:-)
-NT
- (boxley)
- Feb. 9, 2004, 09:22:24 PM EST
What will teach the stock holders?
- (tuberculosis)
- (1)
- Feb. 9, 2004, 09:59:08 PM EST
No worries, mate!
- (jb4)
- Feb. 11, 2004, 05:28:52 PM EST
Microsoft gets tough on security
- (tuberculosis)
- (2)
- Feb. 2, 2004, 03:20:36 PM EST
How cute.
-NT
- (Silverlock)
- Feb. 2, 2004, 03:28:58 PM EST
Re: Microsoft gets tough on security
- (deSitter)
- Feb. 2, 2004, 03:58:49 PM EST