SCO stabs their own lawyers in the back

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #99,910 by drewk 5/2/03 12:56:15 PM Reply	SCO stabs their own lawyers in the back [link\|http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/04/16/HNscolinux_1.html\|SCO releases Linux for Itanium] The SCO Group has released a Linux server operating system for the 64-bit Intel Itanium processor, the company announced Tuesday. SCO Linux Server 4.0 for the Itanium Processor Family is based on UnitedLinux 1.0, the Linux operating system being marketed by a coalition of four Linux companies, in an effort to promote Linux interoperability and compete with U.S. market Linux leader Red Hat. By releasing this system under the GPL, SCO has just agreee to share any of their intellectualy property they included. So what are they suing for again? === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #99,941 by admin 5/2/03 3:14:07 PM Reply	ROFL And it's hard to stab a snake in the back... Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #99,942 by jake123 5/2/03 3:15:06 PM Reply	Hey! You're maligning snakes everywhere with that one --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #99,943 by admin 5/2/03 3:15:38 PM Reply	Sorry. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #99,944 by jake123 5/2/03 3:18:02 PM Reply	:) --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

SCO's other shoe drops: SCO source code found in Linux - (admin) - (16) - May 2, 2003, 10:43:18 AM EDT

Simple solution - (drewk) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 10:50:44 AM EDT

Wouldn't it be funny... - (folkert) - May 2, 2003, 11:28:42 AM EDT

Linux revision control - (kmself) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 11:40:24 AM EDT

Wouldn't that *have* to be the case? - (drewk) - May 2, 2003, 11:57:09 AM EDT

SCO stabs their own lawyers in the back - (drewk) - (4) - May 2, 2003, 12:56:15 PM EDT

ROFL - (admin) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 03:14:07 PM EDT

Hey! You're maligning snakes everywhere with that one -NT - (jake123) - (2) - May 2, 2003, 03:15:06 PM EDT

Sorry. -NT - (admin) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 03:15:38 PM EDT

:) -NT - (jake123) - May 2, 2003, 03:18:02 PM EDT

So 10 lines of code == 20 years of [...] IP? - (jb4) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 01:25:40 PM EDT

Hmmm - I wonder 'which' code they refer to ... IBM - (dmarker) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 06:27:19 PM EDT

Reminds me of Ashton Tate vs. Fox - (tablizer) - May 3, 2003, 01:41:35 AM EDT

Depends on level of difference - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:35:33 AM EDT

Eric Raymond deconstructs SCO's argument. - (Another Scott) - (2) - May 5, 2003, 02:09:59 PM EDT

Excellent resource. Thanks Scott -NT - (screamer) - May 6, 2003, 02:04:21 PM EDT

The GPL argument is particularly compelling IMO - (kmself) - May 7, 2003, 01:54:17 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Nannyish, perhaps.
52 ms