Yesterday's index.html weighed in at 24.5 K... todays is about 16.9 K. That's quite a substantial bit of savings in the bandwidth department.
If I could find a way to get rid of all that javascript that tseliot was talking about, I'd be in business.
request for comments and corrections
- (cwbrenn)
- (18)
- April 8, 2003, 01:09:10 AM EDT
Font size is ok...
- (bepatient)
- April 8, 2003, 01:40:43 AM EDT
Looks pretty good
- (tseliot)
- (2)
- April 8, 2003, 02:38:18 AM EDT
Re: Looks pretty good
- (cwbrenn)
- (1)
- April 8, 2003, 07:49:11 AM EDT
Looks pretty keen, then :)
- (tseliot)
- April 8, 2003, 11:04:55 AM EDT
Seems to load faster
- (Ashton)
- (10)
- April 8, 2003, 05:50:10 AM EDT
It is significantly smaller.
- (cwbrenn)
- April 8, 2003, 08:05:06 AM EDT
WHAT??????
- (tseliot)
- (8)
- April 8, 2003, 11:05:39 AM EDT
LOL
- (cwbrenn)
- April 8, 2003, 12:01:04 PM EDT
No... I sent him a CD with Winders Moz v1.2.1 on it...
- (folkert)
- (5)
- April 8, 2003, 12:12:11 PM EDT
Well, one planned assault went haywire
- (Ashton)
- (4)
- April 10, 2003, 08:18:33 AM EDT
OT: Ashton, you need to fix that command...
- (inthane-chan)
- (3)
- April 10, 2003, 11:07:55 AM EDT
Ah.. OK - guess it needs a defrag anyway..
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- April 10, 2003, 03:39:11 PM EDT
:D
- (inthane-chan)
- April 10, 2003, 03:44:30 PM EDT
Re: OT: Ashton, you need to [horrorshow]
- (Ashton)
- April 10, 2003, 04:08:31 PM EDT
Too gadgety: I'm back on Mosaic
- (Ashton)
- April 10, 2003, 08:07:05 AM EDT
any thoughts on how to fix *this* beauty?
- (cwbrenn)
- (2)
- April 8, 2003, 08:02:09 AM EDT
Try changing position:absolute to position:relative
- (tseliot)
- (1)
- April 8, 2003, 11:09:12 AM EDT
Ah, I see now.
- (cwbrenn)
- April 8, 2003, 12:00:21 PM EDT