IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New given what's at stake
...geopolitically speaking, I'm fairly confident we'll be able to produce the dreaded Iraqi WMDs, even if we have to provide these ourselves. Does anyone think that after making away with a national election in broad daylight this outfit would shrink from planting evidence at night?

cordially,
"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
New mega-dittoes.
Which is why I'm hammering on the subject NOW.

If Saddam has them, why isn't he using them.

If he is NOT using them because he wants to make some point, then he's not the threat we claimed he was.

His life is in danger and his government is going to be overthrown.

Reverse the positions and Bush would be tossing nukes left and right.

Once the "war" is over, we'll probably "find" lots of "WMD's" that, somehow, just never got used.

It isn't because we moved to quickly. We were setup in Kuwait.

It isn't because this was a surprise. Well, not after the 48 hour speech and the missile attack on the palace.

It isn't because all the Iraqis surrendered.

I'm noticing a LOT of silence on this subject from Marlowe.

The one who claimed that the current regime had information about the existance of those weapons.

But somehow we wouldn't provide such to the inspectors.

And so forth.

New More on that subject.
[link|http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13989-2003Mar23.html|Rumsfeld Acknowledges Missing U.S. Soldiers]

The Pentagon said U.S. troops hunting for banned chemical and biological weapons and Scud missiles have so far come up empty. Rumsfeld said allied forces so far are "not in that business" of searching for weapons of mass destruction inside Iraq because they have been "on the ground 72 hours fighting a war."

The CIA has gathered "massive amounts of information" on weapons of mass destruction and Iraq, Rumsfeld said.

Iraq denies U.S. assertions it has any chemical or biological weapons.

Myers said war planners "have to be prepared for the worst case" - that Iraqi troops will use such weapons.

"The intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance is focused looking for those delivery means, the best we can," Myer said.

"It's very hard to see where some of these things are stored, but the delivery means a little more obvious. And so we're going after those delivery means."
New You'll note
that while the US has allowed reporters to tag along with the troops...UN weapon inspectors are NOT allowed along.
New Hey! They would come in handy!
Maybe you should suggest this to Gen'l Tom.
-drl
     Scud question - (jake123) - (9)
         Another possibility is ... - (bluke) - (8)
             It could be. But I'm doubtful. - (Brandioch) - (7)
                 Third Possibility - (gdaustin) - (6)
                     Now switch that around a bit. - (Brandioch) - (5)
                         given what's at stake - (rcareaga) - (4)
                             mega-dittoes. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                 More on that subject. - (Brandioch)
                             You'll note - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                                 Hey! They would come in handy! - (deSitter)

The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading only.
47 ms