Post #85,657
3/4/03 11:18:20 PM
|
Compiling GNUstep/GNUstepWeb, etc.
Sloppy work. I've never seen code with so many warnings... We'll see if it works or not.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #85,665
3/5/03 12:07:42 AM
|
I think you need to be root for make install to work.
But nothing tells you that. :-/
Wade.
Is it enough to love Is it enough to breathe Somebody rip my heart out And leave me here to bleed
| | Is it enough to die Somebody save my life I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary Please
| -- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne. |
|
Post #85,667
3/5/03 12:11:02 AM
|
No, that's in the HOWTO.
It's the compilation that's messy; the part that comes *before* 'make install'... ;-)
Lots of warnings, etc. Garbage code. If they can't be arsed to make it compile cleanly, then what's the overall quality of the code in the first place?
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #90,626
3/23/03 11:00:21 AM
|
Re: No, that's in the HOWTO.
>| Lots of warnings, etc. Garbage code. If they can't be arsed to make it compile cleanly, then what's the overall quality of the code in the first place?
With versions do you use ? Last CVSes ones ? Don't hesitate to help us improve GNUstep. Gurus are always welcome.
Manuel
|
Post #90,630
3/23/03 11:10:13 AM
|
Hey... new blood... Welcome...
I knew I smelled something fresh this morning!
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them. "Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #90,663
3/23/03 11:49:34 AM
|
March 4th.
My point being, there should be no "clean-up" step. Code should not be considered to be "compiled" until the warnings are no longer there. Warnings are not to be ignored; for the most part they are a result of incorrect assumptions on the part of the programmer.
As far as improving GSweb goes, I haven't used it much yet. Once I get into it I'm sure I'll have some additions to make.
As far as being a guru, well, I just started learning Objective C recently. So, give me a few weeks first. ;-)
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #85,672
3/5/03 12:36:36 AM
|
Of course, you've never seen...
...Windows Build or do I stand corrected?
Of course I'm assuming *THAT* spaghetti code has warnings... and ignored crits... and ignored fatals...
/me grining...
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!] | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them. "Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints. |
|
Post #90,624
3/23/03 10:57:50 AM
|
Re: Compiling GNUstep/GNUstepWeb, etc.
>| Sloppy work. I've never seen code with so many warnings... We'll see if it works or not.
Last CVS versions of GNUstepWeb have been cleaned. Feel free to particpate to its improvement.
Manuel
|