What I would like to see reported about slammer... - (ben_tilly) - (36) - Jan. 26, 2003, 06:56:08 PM EST
         Re: What I would like to see reported about slammer... - (deSitter) - (19) - Jan. 26, 2003, 07:10:29 PM EST
             You may be over it... - (folkert) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2003, 07:24:29 PM EST
                 Simple Answer - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2003, 07:37:39 PM EST
                     Yep... I am there with you... BUT... - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2003, 08:43:15 PM EST
                         Slammer blame game begins - MS squirms ... - (dmarker) - Jan. 27, 2003, 09:18:36 PM EST
             Exchange does not run on SQL Server. -NT - (pwhysall) - (14) - Jan. 28, 2003, 12:38:59 PM EST
                 Interesting - correct - (deSitter) - (13) - Jan. 29, 2003, 05:05:41 AM EST
                     Again, incorrect. - (pwhysall) - (12) - Jan. 29, 2003, 07:15:36 AM EST
                         Re: Again, incorrect. - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 29, 2003, 07:31:37 AM EST
                             You didn't read the links. -NT - (pwhysall) - Jan. 29, 2003, 09:05:43 AM EST
                             Allow me to quote. - (pwhysall) - Jan. 29, 2003, 09:07:27 AM EST
                             I'll back up Peter here. - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 29, 2003, 11:53:14 AM EST
                         The next version of Exchange Server . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Jan. 29, 2003, 11:30:42 PM EST
                             Titanicum...? -NT - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 29, 2003, 11:35:26 PM EST
                                 Funny! -NT - (folkert) - Jan. 30, 2003, 08:48:53 AM EST
                             Ahhh... I thought the next version os Exchange was called... - (folkert) - Jan. 30, 2003, 08:48:35 AM EST
                         And databases limited to 2 Gig. Or did they remove that? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Feb. 5, 2003, 08:30:58 PM EST
                             I think they removed it - (orion) - (2) - Feb. 5, 2003, 10:38:25 PM EST
                                 I wasn't clear. I meant MSDE had 2 gig database limit. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 07:46:10 PM EST
                                     For MSDE, that is still true - (orion) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:38:40 PM EST
         The other question: Why so many net-connected SQL servers? - (kmself) - (15) - Jan. 28, 2003, 12:36:55 AM EST
             Re: The other question: Why so many net-connected SQL serve - (rickmoen) - (8) - Jan. 28, 2003, 02:31:43 AM EST
                 So many people don't understand firewalls. - (static) - (5) - Jan. 28, 2003, 05:17:19 AM EST
                     Re: So many people don't understand firewalls. - (rickmoen) - (4) - Jan. 28, 2003, 05:38:29 AM EST
                         Re: So many people don't understand firewalls. - (deSitter) - Jan. 28, 2003, 05:54:08 AM EST
                         Ahh.. the IT ignorant in it's native environment.... - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2003, 09:49:07 AM EST
                             Firewalls - (dmarker) - Jan. 28, 2003, 07:52:34 PM EST
                         Yep. - (static) - Jan. 28, 2003, 08:28:32 PM EST
                 No objections here - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 29, 2003, 08:58:11 PM EST
                     Re: No objections here - (rickmoen) - Jan. 29, 2003, 01:58:35 AM EST
             Most probably don't know whats running - (tuberculosis) - Jan. 28, 2003, 07:17:58 AM EST
             What killed Microsoft. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Jan. 28, 2003, 11:31:00 AM EST
                 An interesting line - (dmarker) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2003, 08:02:21 PM EST
                     what happens sometimes is that a db port is open thru the fw - (boxley) - Jan. 28, 2003, 08:16:17 PM EST
             Partial answer (from BUGTRAQ) - (kmself) - Jan. 28, 2003, 03:49:53 PM EST
             I don't know - but it hit MS itself - (tuberculosis) - Jan. 31, 2003, 10:16:32 PM EST