Wont try to pretend to understand the math, that whooshing sound was most of the equations going over my head. The paper was very good at describing what the math purported to be.
It appears that the biggest problem is defining space/time when doing an observation. After a period of thought I wonder.
There is a co-relation between mass and gravity that is measurable under the classic model. mass and gravity have a direct relationship. Space and (gravitymass) are related we can see that looking at the moon and the earth relationship to the sun and other planets.
Does time have a direct relationship to mass also?
less mass isolated from other gravitational impulses does time run differently in a measured manner?
If we took a measurable 1/2 life of a known object(say strontium90 which is 28 yrs) in a vacuum on earth, used earth time to measure a given period while at the same time in a vacuum on mercury or one of the asteroids would the fissionable material also disappear in 28 earth yrs?
also noted in the paper I saw no mention (or didnt know I was looking at it) negative intergers. Is there no room for them?
thanx,
bill