IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New with Win 95, no problems so far (w/Edimax)
If Andrew is right, that may be another reason for sticking with Win 95 (or Win98) -- my Win desktop has to be able to work reliably with a switchbox.

I'd think you'd want a real server OS to be able to work reliably with a switchbox. So, if W2K can't handle switchboxes, it isn't a real server OS.

Tony
New Re: with Win 95, no problems so far (w/Edimax)
No problems here, 2 servers running W2K Server SP2, Belkin OmniCube 4 port KVM.

Works just dandy.
--
Peter
Shill For Hire
New You'd think so, wouldn't you?
However, with a purely mechanicial switchbox, Win2k would lose the keyboard and the mouse. Windows 95b didn't. So I found a switchbox with mouse and keyboard emulation so the PC doesn't see it vanish. Now Win2k just loses the mouse acceleration. :-/

The very expensive switchboxes are better at this, and so is "proper" server hardware. My old no-name motherboard doesn't like the PS/2 mouse disappearing at all and my Asus motherboard isn't a great deal better. However, I found that all the Dell Poweredge servers I've worked on don't care at all, no matter what OS is running.

Wade.

"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

     Problem with a console switch box - (JayMehaffey) - (7)
         Which Windows? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
             Windows ME - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                 Windows ME? Just shoot yourself now. - (wharris2)
         everytime you switch to windows, reboot:)I lose mice also :( -NT - (boxley) - (3)
             with Win 95, no problems so far (w/Edimax) - (tonytib) - (2)
                 Re: with Win 95, no problems so far (w/Edimax) - (pwhysall)
                 You'd think so, wouldn't you? - (static)

It’s always projection with these guys.
160 ms