Solution

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #76,038 by Arkadiy 1/21/03 11:23:30 PM Reply	Solution `-fpermissive' Downgrade messages about nonconformant code from errors to warnings. By default, G++ effectively sets `-pedantic-errors' without `-pedantic'; this option reverses that. This behavior and this option are superseded by `-pedantic', which works as it does for GNU C. I think GCC is no less fucked than C++ standard. But at least you can make it swallow the code. -- We have only 2 things to worry about: That things will never get back to normal, and that they already have.
Post #76,039 by admin 1/21/03 11:24:50 PM Reply	ROFL But at least you can make it swallow the code. gcc: the compiler that swallows, not spits. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #76,119 by a6l6e6x 1/22/03 11:08:55 AM Reply	Re: "..you can make it swallow the code." Beautiful! Alex "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session."\t-- Mark Twain

I *heart* C++ - (admin) - (30) - Jan. 17, 2003, 11:52:49 AM EST

GNU compilers both sides? - (marlowe) - Jan. 17, 2003, 12:54:16 PM EST

What is the type of m_server_address? - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Jan. 17, 2003, 02:55:27 PM EST

As noted: - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2003, 03:01:40 PM EST

Re: As noted: - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2003, 03:04:08 PM EST

It isn't. - (admin) - Jan. 17, 2003, 03:05:50 PM EST

Fix: - (admin) - (24) - Jan. 17, 2003, 03:04:37 PM EST

const is a design error - (tuberculosis) - (23) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:17:22 AM EDT

One of my directives for this port: - (admin) - (8) - Jan. 17, 2003, 04:38:07 PM EST

Re: One of my directives for this port: - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 17, 2003, 05:22:29 PM EST

The "const" attribute means that, within the given scope,... - (a6l6e6x) - (6) - Jan. 17, 2003, 05:42:03 PM EST

Because it's not supposed to be modified... - (ChrisR) - (5) - Jan. 17, 2003, 07:31:13 PM EST

Yes, I remember all that.. - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 17, 2003, 10:31:53 PM EST

Re: why bother? - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2003, 10:58:51 PM EST

Well, yes, that was what BS was obsessing on - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2003, 11:06:45 PM EST

Clearly BS hates programmers and doesn't trust them - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:25:33 AM EDT

Re: Because it's not supposed to be modified... - (JimWeirich) - Jan. 18, 2003, 10:58:42 PM EST

Re: const is a design error - (JimWeirich) - (13) - Jan. 17, 2003, 05:07:46 PM EST

Only if such differences exist - (tuberculosis) - (12) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:17:37 AM EDT

Fun in computing. - (static) - Jan. 18, 2003, 06:37:38 AM EST

Re: Only if such differences exist - (JimWeirich) - (10) - Jan. 18, 2003, 10:33:25 PM EST

const functions - (tuberculosis) - (9) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:28:10 AM EDT

Well, it doesnt' appear to be overloaded on const - (Simon_Jester) - (8) - Jan. 21, 2003, 01:53:21 PM EST

Re: Well, it doesnt' appear to be overloaded on const - (JimWeirich) - Jan. 21, 2003, 03:47:40 PM EST

No, thats exactly the problem - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:37:06 AM EDT

This is what bugs me in Scott's problem... - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Jan. 21, 2003, 05:42:24 PM EST

I was pissed enough at the problem - (Arkadiy) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2003, 09:43:01 PM EST

I was pissed enough that I: - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2003, 10:37:18 PM EST

Solution - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2003, 11:23:30 PM EST

ROFL - (admin) - Jan. 21, 2003, 11:24:50 PM EST

Re: "..you can make it swallow the code." Beautiful! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 22, 2003, 11:08:55 AM EST

¡Despierte, Estupido-idiota!
115 ms