IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New would scripting languages be anything with an interpreter?
as opposed to a standalone compiled executable? If a file may be run natively it is a program. If a file must call an interpreter it is a script.
Scripting languages
Perl
Basic
xbase
C#
compiled programs
c++
pascal
forth
assembler
not to say simplicity and power as well as ease of use is granted to either class
thanx,
bill
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
New Yup, IMO. Oh, and you forgot one: Java.
New Not necessarily.
Most BASIC interpreters actually execute a sort of p-code version of the program. Even Visual BASIC did that until quite recently. Those found in home computers of the '80s actually wrote a tokenised version into memory, which it translated as you entered lines. OTOH, BASIC compilers have been around a long time, too. So.

In fact, the line is blurry: Perl is translated into an internal p-code version before it executes it. This is much like what happens with virtual machine languages like Java and Icon, but without the explicit step of "compiling" (Icon's "compiler" is actually called a translator, incidentally). Interestingly, SNOBOL functions like Perl, with an implicit translation prior to execution.

Wade.

"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

New I wouldn't draw the line there
And even if you did you would have various cases on the boundary.

For instance Forth and Pascal both have had incarnations as interpreted languages.

Python and Lisp are examples of languages which are often run both as interpreted languages and as compiled programs.

As I said, I would draw the line at the point that a scripting language is one which has as a significant design consideration that it should be possible to write useful programs with very little code. Of course that doesn't make that the only design consideration for the language, and it doesn't mean that such languages are only useful for short programs...

Cheers,
Ben
     Getting the owning window of an HTMLElement? - (admin) - (35)
         *sigh* - (Fearless Freep) - (21)
             You're a lot of help. ;-) - (admin) - (20)
                 thanks! - (Fearless Freep) - (19)
                     Re: thanks! - (admin) - (18)
                         Re: thanks! - (Fearless Freep) - (5)
                             Last impression - (admin) - (4)
                                 Ahh....forgot that - (Fearless Freep) - (3)
                                     Have you considered telling people? - (admin) - (2)
                                         Are you kidding? - (Fearless Freep) - (1)
                                             Well... - (admin)
                         Excuse me? - (ben_tilly) - (11)
                             Well, they're wrong. - (admin) - (10)
                                 Everything has its place - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                                     Your horse is getting taller by the minute. - (tseliot) - (8)
                                         What is a scripting language? - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                                             Good and bad scripting. - (static) - (2)
                                                 Unix scripting... - (ChrisR) - (1)
                                                     That is partly how it was designed - (ben_tilly)
                                             would scripting languages be anything with an interpreter? - (boxley) - (3)
                                                 Yup, IMO. Oh, and you forgot one: Java. -NT - (CRConrad)
                                                 Not necessarily. - (static)
                                                 I wouldn't draw the line there - (ben_tilly)
         Try '.parent' - (drewk) - (12)
             Nope. - (admin) - (11)
                 Either call from the element itself or pass params - (tseliot) - (1)
                     I passed params. - (admin)
                 My stuff's not in front of me... - (ChrisR) - (8)
                     We own all of the frames. - (admin) - (7)
                         hmmm... - (ChrisR) - (5)
                             No dice. - (admin) - (4)
                                 Non standard - (ChrisR) - (3)
                                     Yes, that seems to work. - (admin) - (2)
                                         Natch - (ChrisR) - (1)
                                             Still some problems with DOM in IE 5.5 - (admin)
                         "All your frame are belong to us"? - (Fearless Freep)

Powered by Arkadiy!
85 ms