IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New And they blow chuncks even on "slow" 300 MHz x86's
which really isn't that slow IMHO.

I just had to switch a friend off a "56K" soft modem that crapped out every five minutes or so for a slower (28.8K IIRC) but much more reliable hardware modem.

Tony
New Re: And they blow chuncks even on "slow" 300 MHz x86's
My Toshiba was 300 PII. The 56k software modem performance was comparible to the 56k hardware PCMCIA modem. The latter had better noise reduction technology so it tended to win by 3-6k.

-drl
     In Praise of Software Modems - (deSitter) - (15)
         And they blow chuncks even on "slow" 300 MHz x86's - (tonytib) - (1)
             Re: And they blow chuncks even on "slow" 300 MHz x86's - (deSitter)
         In Praise of Hardware Modems - (folkert) - (10)
             PCMCIA Modems - (deSitter) - (2)
                 Message taken ... - (folkert) - (1)
                     Always wanted.. - (deSitter)
             I like to watch the pretty lights also -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                 For sure! That's why I like hubs/switches too. Disco lights! -NT - (Meerkat)
             So who makes good hardware modems these days? - (lincoln) - (4)
                 USR has been trouble-free for me. Pricey though. - (Another Scott)
                 USR still makes great modems... - (folkert)
                 We use the ActionTech "Call Waiting" PCI modem . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                 Re: So who makes good hardware modems these days? - (orion)
         Mo - (tseliot) - (1)
             One of the more significant inventions - (deSitter)

Globes ... or flutes?
75 ms