Re: no I think he was talking about the AIN

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #66,343 by rickmoen 12/3/02 1:50:58 AM Reply	Re: no I think he was talking about the AIN not ed zachery it is databases, intelligent swiches over a 56k connection everywhere. The statement while true is like saying the internet is all frames over an atm backbone while not quite mentioning dns, hierarchies etc. It is obvious we are somehow talking at cross-purposes. Use or non-use of AIN/IN-based technology is really not relevant to the point the SANS-institute weenie apparently was trying to make about the Internet in analogy to switched digital telephony. But then, the SANS guy (probably) really didn't have anything specific in mind, anyway. Unless, of course, you're seriously trying to allege you think the SANS guy was claiming some intelligent services-programming model similar to AIN is likely to be superimposed on the 'Net in the near future, in which case he was simply wrong and/or flippin' nuts. Rick Moen rick@linuxmafia.com If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already.
Post #66,384 by boxley 12/3/02 10:07:23 AM Reply	wrong/flipping nuts would be the correct answer SANS guys with a few exceptions like Norfolk etc are cheerleaders not technicians IMHO having attended a few sessions here and there. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
Post #66,614 by drewk 12/4/02 10:36:07 AM Reply	That was my impression He seemed to by suggesting that a pretty radical rethinking of basic internet protocols was both desirable and inevitable. === Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978\|Andrew Grygus]

Question about IP vs. POTS - (drewk) - (9) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:02:55 PM EST

how phone calls work - (boxley) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:18:39 PM EST

Gawd - are people really this stupid? - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:25:12 PM EST

Can't find a reference - (drewk) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 04:16:52 PM EST

Re: Can't find a reference - (deSitter) - Dec. 2, 2002, 04:30:01 PM EST

Re: Question about IP vs. POTS - (rickmoen) - (4) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:07:12 PM EST

no I think he was talking about the AIN - (boxley) - (3) - Dec. 3, 2002, 01:12:02 AM EST

Re: no I think he was talking about the AIN - (rickmoen) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2002, 01:50:58 AM EST

wrong/flipping nuts would be the correct answer - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 10:07:23 AM EST

That was my impression - (drewk) - Dec. 4, 2002, 10:36:07 AM EST

iwethey.org

A.A.P.B. certified.
78 ms