Echelon

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #63,069 by bepatient 11/15/02 2:03:58 PM Reply	Echelon [link\|http://www.gurusinc.com/aa/echelon/\|In case you missed it] Oh...wait...they said that they weren't actually using the monitoring against our own citizens. And no...they don't actually >store< any of those records. Yeah. Right. By the way...I have a bridge to Brooklyn I'll sell you...cheap. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #63,078 by boxley 11/15/02 2:38:30 PM Reply	they dont its true its true the details, we monitor the Brits and turn over the summaries to them and they monitor our stuff and give summaries to us. That way the laws of neither country are broken. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] "Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." Correction: All that can be achieved with 51 percent of the voters!" Ilanna Mercer
Post #63,083 by Simon_Jester 11/15/02 2:52:54 PM Reply	Yep, likewise with Australia and France, iirc. of course, Echelon wouldn't even be known about except that somehow inside information somehow helped 2 American companies gain an advantage over French companies, iirc. Nor is Echelon the first. I remember reading about Harvester (it's predecessor, iirc) back in the 80's.
Post #63,129 by hnick 11/15/02 5:37:45 PM Reply	Can't do that bro... That bridge has been in my family for generations.

Big Brother Poindexter - (tuberculosis) - (26) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:15:57 AM EDT

that sumbich should have been jailed the last time around - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2002, 05:57:58 PM EST

You don't jail Ronnie's buddies! - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2002, 09:34:55 AM EST

shrub seniors buddies you mean, Dutch wuz snoozin -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 15, 2002, 10:45:33 AM EST

I think it's time... - (jake123) - (11) - Nov. 14, 2002, 06:07:00 PM EST

agreed! - (jb4) - Nov. 15, 2002, 09:39:11 AM EST

Not Your Father's Republicans - (deSitter) - Nov. 15, 2002, 09:53:23 AM EST

The only surprise here.. - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 15, 2002, 11:49:39 AM EST

Excuse me, but... - (jb4) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2002, 01:33:19 PM EST

Echelon - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2002, 02:03:58 PM EST

they dont its true its true - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2002, 02:38:30 PM EST

Yep, likewise with Australia and France, iirc. - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 15, 2002, 02:52:54 PM EST

Can't do that bro... - (hnick) - Nov. 15, 2002, 05:37:45 PM EST

I think you're quite correct about the progression. - (Ashton) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2002, 06:21:07 PM EST

how good is the data in your database? - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2002, 06:34:56 PM EST

Bingo. - (Brandioch) - Nov. 15, 2002, 09:22:57 PM EST

Nice. I like how they waited til the end to mention: - (admin) - Nov. 14, 2002, 06:53:17 PM EST

Link to DARPA IAO here. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2002, 11:43:13 PM EST

Don't You Get It? - (deSitter) - (7) - Nov. 15, 2002, 09:58:58 AM EST

*Brevity* AND Physics-concept Award -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 15, 2002, 06:24:21 PM EST

"Is that what you want?" No. Wasn't I clear? - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 15, 2002, 10:13:24 PM EST

Translation: - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2002, 11:01:34 PM EST

Non sequitur. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 16, 2002, 12:08:10 AM EST

Mostly wrong - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 16, 2002, 06:17:21 PM EST

I see, but I disagree. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2002, 08:11:03 PM EST

I don't think you read closely enough... - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 16, 2002, 08:34:19 PM EST

how many program objectives have you seen in IT - (boxley) - Nov. 15, 2002, 10:47:17 AM EST

Aim for the flattop!
59 ms