IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Is the assumption here that
Post #6,156
by mhuber
8/21/01 5:59:22 PM
Reply
New Is the assumption here that
the literature/education makes it more likely that the kids will turn out gay?

Any evidence that that is the case?

The most toxic person I've had to deal with in the last 5 years (guy made a very serious effort to destroy my wife's costume business, as far as I can tell out of sheer spite. Failed only because he's screwed so many people (and I don't mean sexualy) lately that his suggestions not to deal with Kim backfired.) is probably that way because he's a raging homophobe. And openly gay. Self esteem is overhyped, but self loathing is quite toxic, and not just to the individual involved.

White guys in suits know best
- Pat McCurdy
Post #6,200
by boxley
8/21/01 11:12:17 PM
Reply
New nope it is the concern that my kids dont
hafta listen to any more worrisome shit than they hafta before it slaps em in the face anyway. Kids have lotsa problems with learning how to act, please other, be polite. Kids naturally want to be like for who they but they really dont know who they are yet. All I am saying that keep sex out of the mix until puberty when it matters.
Hey dad should I be a dick licker when I grow up?
Son I rather you worried about learning how to read and right and learn to swim before you figure out yer future sexual identity.
thats all,
thanx,
bill
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
     warning explicit anti pc language follows and Meerkat - (boxley) - (19) - Aug. 17, 2001, 10:28:27 AM EDT
         Please fix the URL - it makes the screen much too wide. - (Another Scott) - Aug. 16, 2001, 10:31:58 PM EDT
         Ummm... Bill, I thought you lived in Florida... - (Simon_Jester) - Aug. 16, 2001, 11:13:25 PM EDT
         Notice 'narrow / wide' radio button? - (Ashton) - Aug. 17, 2001, 12:57:08 AM EDT
         Arguments againts (formatting aside) - (wharris2) - (5) - Aug. 17, 2001, 04:39:16 AM EDT
             I think I get it. At least I feel nauseous a bit. So then.. - (Ashton) - Aug. 17, 2001, 06:57:34 AM EDT
             Peta would compreHENsively slate you for that... -NT - (pwhysall) - Aug. 17, 2001, 10:36:18 AM EDT
             Perfectly fucking stupid arguments. - (CRConrad) - Aug. 17, 2001, 05:52:33 PM EDT
             Is the assumption here that - (mhuber) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2001, 05:59:22 PM EDT
                 nope it is the concern that my kids dont - (boxley) - Aug. 21, 2001, 11:12:17 PM EDT
         Why, exactly? - (CRConrad) - (9) - Aug. 17, 2001, 05:52:55 PM EDT
             twang, twang, twang,twang,twang,twang,twang - (boxley) - (8) - Aug. 17, 2001, 06:21:00 PM EDT
                 No you haven't: unless you're blowing smoke re - (Ashton) - (3) - Aug. 17, 2001, 07:08:52 PM EDT
                     nope gotta disagree - (boxley) - (2) - Aug. 17, 2001, 07:23:55 PM EDT
                         You do have a point. - (a6l6e6x) - Aug. 17, 2001, 11:10:01 PM EDT
                         Jesuits pegged it first: - (Ashton) - Aug. 18, 2001, 02:12:59 AM EDT
                 No you don't. Not if you want to be human. - (CRConrad) - (3) - Aug. 19, 2001, 01:45:15 PM EDT
                     whose norms? - (boxley) - (2) - Aug. 19, 2001, 08:49:03 PM EDT
                         Then keep 'em in a cage; don't inflict 'em on the public. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2001, 04:40:44 PM EDT
                             the public think they are nice little boys - (boxley) - Aug. 21, 2001, 10:35:21 PM EDT

That is not actually a charming anecdote!
63 ms