The reason? According to [link|http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?ptitle=Top%20Financial%20News&s1=blk&tp=ad_topright_topfin&T=markets_box.ht&s2=ad_right1_topfin&bt=ad_position1_topfin&box=ad_box_all&tag=financial&middle=ad_frame2_topfin&s=APcggzxUeTWljcm9z|Bloomberg] (the URL will change), there's too much litigation risk:
Bellevue, Washington, Nov. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft Corp., whose antitrust settlement with the U.S. government was approved Friday, is unable to pay dividends because the world's biggest software maker faces other lawsuits, Chief Financial Officer John Connors told shareholders.
``While the ruling Friday was a positive, we still face some significant legal issues,'' Connors said at Microsoft's annual shareholder meeting in Bellevue, Washington. ``The board has determined it would not be appropriate to commit to a long-term program like a dividend.''
Microsoft, which had $40.5 billion in cash and securities as of Sept. 30, is under increasing pressure to pay a dividend to shareholders. They've watched their holdings lose 16 percent of their value this year and 53 percent from an all-time high in December 1999.
...
$40B in hand isn't enough to pay a dividend. Garbage.
This reasoning is another reflection that it's all about power with MS's management. Not serving the company's owners.
Cheers,
Scott.