IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Good Reason?
I can think of good reasons to have warp cores. There is a small problem - warp cores don't exist, and never will. Missile shields are on that level. They don't exist, and never will. I worked on Star Wars, the problems are the same now as then, despite a 1000-fold increase in computing power. There is no way to deal with all the possible decoys. The limitation is in radar systems.

Moreover, it's 200 bil down the drain, for essentially nothing. Reagan drained the economy dry in the 80s, by the early 90s we were in a deep recession. Want that again?
New OT: 1990-1991 recession wasn't "deep"
for recent values of "deep"...

[link|http://www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.html|The NBER's Recession Dating Procedure in the Light of Current Developments] says industrial production fell 4.6% (peak to trough) and employment fell around 2%. The peak to trough was around 9 months.

Some alternate data from the Federal Reserve is show in Table 11 of [link|http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/20010216/g17.pdf|this] PDF (beware - it's over 200 kB). It shows the quarterly industrial production numbers as changing as follows:

1981:
Q1 - +1.9%
Q2 - +2.2%
Q3 - +4.1%
Q4 - -10.5%

1982:
Q1 - -6.4%
Q2 - -5.2%
Q3 - -7.3%
Q4 - -7.5%

In contrast, the 1990-1991 recession was:

1990:
Q1 - +2.0%
Q2 - +0.6%
Q3 - +1.0%
Q4 - -5.8%

1991:
Q1 - -8.3%
Q2 - +1.5%
Q3 - +6.2%
Q4 - +1.1%

I haven't been able to find NBER data on changes in employment and industrial production for the 1980-1981 recession in my brief looking...

So, at least by the standard of the 1981-1982 recession, the 1990-1991 recession wasn't deep. I agree with your statement that it would be a waste of money to push for a NMD system though.

Cheers,
Scott.
     WashPost OpEd: Why Russians fears missile defense. - (Another Scott) - (49)
         Re: WashPost OpEd: Why Russians fears missile defense. - (addison) - (44)
             So lemme get this straight... - (jb4) - (41)
                 None of the above - (wharris2)
                 I'll attempt to straighten you out... - (addison) - (39)
                     It's not so simple. - (Another Scott) - (30)
                         No, its not. - (addison) - (16)
                             Couple of things. - (Another Scott) - (15)
                                 Re: Couple of things. - (addison) - (14)
                                     Battling analogies. Bring it on! :-) - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                         Re: Battling analogies. Bring it on! :-) - (addison) - (2)
                                             Morels! :-) - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                                 A thousand pardons. :-( - (Another Scott)
                                     The only real problems I see with the ABM shield... - (Simon_Jester) - (9)
                                         My take.... - (bepatient) - (8)
                                             Impossible - (wharris2) - (1)
                                                 There's that issue, too. - (bepatient)
                                             Re: My take.... - (jb4) - (5)
                                                 Every once in a while... - (bepatient) - (4)
                                                     Don't get too used to it...;-) -NT - (jb4) - (3)
                                                         I was humbled more... - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                             Credit where credit is due! -NT - (jb4)
                                                             I used to be humble - (Ashton)
                         Re: Installing in Alaska will do nothing against a threat... - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                             Alaska was picked because North Korea was viewed ... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 Alaska was picked because Sen for life Ted Stevens - (boxley)
                         Scott - catch NPR discussion Mon re Russia version? - (Ashton) - (9)
                             Nope, I missed it. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 Found it: - (Ashton)
                             Question: how do they propose to do this? - (wharris2) - (6)
                                 Doverai ni proverai.. - (Ashton) - (5)
                                     What is ideal? - (wharris2) - (4)
                                         An excellent solution: ABMs for all. - (Ashton) - (3)
                                             giggling wildly - (wharris2) - (2)
                                                 ..only in your rare moments of relative.... lucidity :-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                     *my* rare moments? -NT - (wharris2)
                     You don't straighten any thing out by adding wrinkles - (jb4) - (7)
                         I didn't. - (addison) - (6)
                             To add a little - (wharris2) - (5)
                                 The imminent threat is not addressed after wasting $BB - (jb4) - (4)
                                     That's merely one possibility. - (addison) - (3)
                                         All of you are missing something - (DonRichards) - (2)
                                             I don't think I'm missing that. - (addison) - (1)
                                                 I don't think I've the patience - (Ashton)
             Good Reason? - (deSitter) - (1)
                 OT: 1990-1991 recession wasn't "deep" - (Another Scott)
         We need a healthy Russian economy - (mhuber) - (3)
             Very well said. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
             Precisamente.. and, it is so evidently basic - (Ashton)
             Good points! -NT - (a6l6e6x)

Thanks for noticing.
117 ms