Sterling rhetoric in service of tawdry mendacity

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #54,909 by marlowe 10/4/02 12:52:20 PM Reply	Sterling rhetoric in service of tawdry mendacity We've been putting this thing off for eleven years now, and this guy has the gall to say it's "in haste." The guy's a demagogue. He's damn good at it, though. [link\|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html\|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html] The nihilists and the liars have buried truth alive in a shallow grave. "We never voted for Saddam" - Imam Husham Al-Husainy
Post #54,922 by ChrisR 10/4/02 2:38:53 PM Reply	So, is this resolution being debated... ...a Declaration of War? If it is, then why isn't being labelled as a such? If not, then what is it? 1. Pass resolution 2. ? 3. U.S. war in Iraq
Post #54,983 by deSitter 10/4/02 11:16:14 PM Reply	"tawdry mendacity"? Is that like meretricious prevarication? -drl
Post #54,985 by boxley 10/4/02 11:26:41 PM Reply	meretriculous prevarication? wondering which lactating stripper to tip? Language is but a canvas, in my case butcher paper. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] qui mori didicit servire dedidicit
Post #55,044 by ben_tilly 10/5/02 8:31:41 AM Reply	As the sign that secretaries like says... [link\|http://www.officeplayground.com/lackplanning.html\|Lack of planning on your part, does not constitute an emergency on my part.] He is right. If Bush wants to finally engage the Iraq problem, it is hasty to start with asking for a blanket resolution that dismantles one of the basic protections that lie between the Republic and tyranny. Bush has started a process. Let that process work. And if in that process Bush decides that war is necessary, then ask the legislative branch for the appropriate declaration. But not until. Cheers, Ben "Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly." - [link\|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html\|Walter Mead]
Post #55,112 by Ashton 10/6/02 7:23:29 AM Reply	% that vote GO Now == % Murican sheep, in full stampede.

Text of Sen. Byrd's opening remarks on war authorization - (Silverlock) - (11) - Oct. 4, 2002, 10:15:13 AM EDT

Why does he hate America so much? - (Brandioch) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2002, 10:00:40 AM EDT

He doesn't - (bepatient) - Oct. 4, 2002, 10:54:51 AM EDT

Fie on Sen. Byrd ; ) - (snork) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2002, 10:03:29 AM EDT

You must have seen a different snippet than I did. - (a6l6e6x) - Oct. 4, 2002, 12:14:52 PM EDT

Re: Text of Sen. Byrd's opening remarks on war authorizatio - (wharris2) - Oct. 4, 2002, 11:41:31 AM EDT

Sterling rhetoric in service of tawdry mendacity - (marlowe) - (5) - Oct. 4, 2002, 12:52:20 PM EDT

So, is this resolution being debated... - (ChrisR) - Oct. 4, 2002, 02:38:53 PM EDT

"tawdry mendacity"? - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2002, 11:16:14 PM EDT

meretriculous prevarication? wondering which lactating - (boxley) - Oct. 4, 2002, 11:26:41 PM EDT

As the sign that secretaries like says... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 5, 2002, 08:31:41 AM EDT

% that vote GO Now == % Murican sheep, in full stampede. -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 6, 2002, 07:23:29 AM EDT

iwethey.org

I'm reconciled to the existence of idiots in the world, but I'm bitterly resentful of whoever it was who first thought to make computer technology available to them.
86 ms