IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Dumb idea
Yes there is a Java api to Cocoa. But the current implementation is in C++. There is an ObjectiveC++ compiler (compiles a mix of ObjectiveC and C++ code making bridging/wrapping easy). Plus, the Java apis to Cocoa are weak compared to the ObjectiveC ones *and* the JVM imposes a VISIBLE performance penalty in both size and speed.

So why saddle the port with Java at all?

Dumb dumb FUCKING dumb idea.

I am out of the country for the duration of the Bush administration.
Please leave a message and I'll get back to you when democracy returns.
New Actuallly, I agree
I don't see what re-writing what is already a very cross-platform oriented codebase buys anyone except Sun's marketing dept.

And as for my second suggestion, it appears that the OpenOffice.org team is planning on [link|http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/roadmap.html#OO638|doing just that].

This probably also means that the original story I posted is confused and that the Java involved refers to the ability to write plug-ins for the suite in Java. I see alot of people make the assumption that StarOffice is written in Java because it a)contains/uses a JRE for said plugins, b)is slow to start up, and c) comes from Sun.
--
Chris Altmann
Expand Edited by altmann July 27, 2002, 05:11:47 PM EDT
     Sun to push StarOffice for Apple's OS X - (altmann) - (6)
         It would be nice - (orion) - (1)
             Not IBM. - (static)
         Why Java? - (tuberculosis) - (3)
             Re: Why Java. - (altmann) - (2)
                 Dumb idea - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                     Actuallly, I agree - (altmann)

NO CARRIER
59 ms