IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New OpEd: The case for Harvey Pitt
[link|http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow/kudlow072302.asp|He's getting the job done.]

Excerpt:

Harvey Pitt may be the most embattled SEC commissioner in our lifetime. But with this move, he has trumped slow-moving congressional legislation with one of the most draconian new regulations in history. Call it Pitt's revenge.

Signed under oath, these new written statements must be filed on or shortly after August 14, 2002. They will require CEOs and financial chiefs at 947 large companies to swear "to the best of my knowledge" that their financial statements are accurate. Importantly, these execs could face criminal as well as civil liability if regulators find any problems in their statements. The SEC intends to make the certifications available to the public on its website.

I say:

I still think Jonathan Chait had a point, sort of. Just not very much of one. Let's judge this guy by his job performance. And judge his job performance by the tangible results. (After all, we don't want to settle for his "doing a good job" merely in the Clintonain sense.)

Forcing CEO's to tell the truth or go to jail would be a pretty tangible result, in my view.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html]
Everything's a mystery until you figure out how it works.
Free Joel Mowbray!
I'm a-gonna put a gun rack on my SUV.
New Same guy who wanted a 'kinder and gentler' SEC?
Yeah, right. Let's give him a chance. Why does that sound so much like 'let's give him enough rope'?

I'd rather not have a man [link|http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_05/b3768014.htm|beholden] to big business in charge of investigating business wrongdoing, thank you very much.
"...the problem with the French is that they don\ufffdt have a word for entrepreneur."

George W. Bush
New Can we keep this BS in politics?
Where it is easier for people to ignore stupid shit like this?

So while in charge in SEC, Harvey Pitt issues a regulation that restores us to something closer to what the status quo was before the Republican Congress imanaged to override Clinton's veto of the Private Securities Litigation Reform act of 1995. And this is the most draconian regulations in history? If you are put up financial statements and know you are lying in them, you should be liable?

WTF? Next the IRS will hold you liable for misrepresenting your income on your tax forms! Whodathunkit?

If Harvey Pitt's backtracking of his promise for a kinder, gentler SEC continues to the point where it shows some real teeth, IMNSHO it will be because his existing record is so bad that he can't really defend himself against criticisms of how he handled the SEC as the markets melt down admist accounting scandals.

Cheers,
Ben
"... I couldn't see how anyone could be educated by this self-propagating system in which people pass exams, teach others to pass exams, but nobody knows anything."
--Richard Feynman
     OpEd: The case for Harvey Pitt - (marlowe) - (2)
         Same guy who wanted a 'kinder and gentler' SEC? - (Silverlock)
         Can we keep this BS in politics? - (ben_tilly)

I am discretely counting the dark sides you have seen.
39 ms