Defendant’s motion recognizes this exception, but then blithely moves on without adequately explaining why it should not apply, or why this exception would not prevail as the more specific statute over any other statutory provisions referencing a deputies’ oath.

...

One might think distinguishing this safe harbor provision would be central to the Defendant’s argument. One would be wrong.

...

The Court has not been provided, nor located, any authority to support this claim.

...

Oh, and the footnote:

The Court appreciates Defendant Chesebro’s recognition that he filed this motion outside the case scheduling order deadline, but will allow an exception and address the merits due to the representation that he only recently obtained the necessary records, and because the motion is so easily dispatched.

tl;dr You missed the deadline and I don't even need to look at this, but it's so bad I want the opportunity to explain all the reasons I'm saying, "No."