NYT The new-depths of the anti-Science policy ramping up, Dictatorially. Final nail-in-our-coffins?
NYT
IMO there's too much sophisticated [How-to-destroy an opponent's Country] sequential actions like this:
to evade the obvious much longer: Putin has [Enough on this Crook] such that: DJT is acting, hourly since day 1 to Follow Those Instructions, driven by his Largest-ƒeare-of all: Public Humiliation. Assured via final dictat of Putin:
[OR. ELSE.]
Now.. throw-in the same anti-Reason BS re The Virus--see any Difference in That idiocy and ^see above^ ??
Rest Case, and if the Case IS made: what Odds shall we give to the (mere possibility-of):
An Election? ..an 'election'?? ..the mere shadow-play-of an election: Nov 3 (or any other ("We'll See.." ..subterfuge)).
Lastly--should DJT remain many more days where he IS--how many consequently-INCREASED heaped-dead-bodies shall evanesce-from Voter-rolls-- whichever bedraggled-Survivors manage ... ... to vote at all?
[NONE of the above could have built-to-THIS: save by the combined-efforts of a Plurality of [any Country's] vox populi, I wot.] If this is not premeditated-seppuku by a Tribe which must be destroyed to--possibly--save the rest of the planet? ..then 'explain': [show your work]
"We'll SEE ..." ... ...
(All it needed was: a Nation ofImmigrants Ignorants) ... each facilitator as Fucked-in-head as their Dear Menace. Simple, eh? 'Sic --> transit..'
Ms. Davenport has covered federal environmental policy since the George W. Bush administration.
March 27, 2020
164
WASHINGTON — President Trump has made rolling back environmental regulations a centerpiece of his administration, moving to erase Obama-era efforts ranging from landmark fuel efficiency standards and coal industry controls to more routine rules on paint solvents and industrial soot.
But all along, scientists and lawyers inside the federal government have embedded statistics and data in regulatory documents that make the rules vulnerable to legal challenges. These facts, often in the technical supporting documents, may hand ammunition to environmental lawyers working to block the president’s policies.
Trump administration loyalists see in the scientists’ efforts evidence that a cabal of bureaucrats and holdovers from previous administrations is intentionally undermining the president and his policies. And there can be little doubt that some career scientists are at odds with the president’s political appointees.
But current and former federal employees who work on environmental science and policy say their efforts to include these facts are a civic and professional duty, done to ensure that science informs policy outcomes and protects the public. Some are trying to preserve regulations they spent years of their lives writing..
[. . .]
IMO there's too much sophisticated [How-to-destroy an opponent's Country] sequential actions like this:
to evade the obvious much longer: Putin has [Enough on this Crook] such that: DJT is acting, hourly since day 1 to Follow Those Instructions, driven by his Largest-ƒeare-of all: Public Humiliation. Assured via final dictat of Putin:
[OR. ELSE.]
Now.. throw-in the same anti-Reason BS re The Virus--see any Difference in That idiocy and ^see above^ ??
Rest Case, and if the Case IS made: what Odds shall we give to the (mere possibility-of):
An Election? ..an 'election'?? ..the mere shadow-play-of an election: Nov 3 (or any other ("We'll See.." ..subterfuge)).
Lastly--should DJT remain many more days where he IS--how many consequently-INCREASED heaped-dead-bodies shall evanesce-from Voter-rolls-- whichever bedraggled-Survivors manage ... ... to vote at all?
[NONE of the above could have built-to-THIS: save by the combined-efforts of a Plurality of [any Country's] vox populi, I wot.] If this is not premeditated-seppuku by a Tribe which must be destroyed to--possibly--save the rest of the planet? ..then 'explain': [show your work]
"We'll SEE ..." ... ...
(All it needed was: a Nation of