IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Voter Suppression isn't just a Repo-thing. Et tu, California?
In February, California mailed 3.7m primary ballots that, to the astonishment of many who received them, excluded the presidential candidates. These ballots do have candidates for all other primary races, including for Congress, but not the race for president.

Within this mountain of primary ballots, artifacts of California’s arcane and complex voting system, lies the potential to cripple the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders, the favored candidate among independent party voters.

Particularly at risk of losing their vote are 18- to 24-year-olds and Latinx voters, groups that strongly favor “Tio Bernie”. A quarter of independent voters, more than 1 million people, are Latinx, according to the Public Policy Institute of California.

Even if Sanders, as expected, wins the plurality of California’s votes, he could well be shorted out of hundreds of thousands of votes and scores of delegates. ...The Democratic National Committee chiefs, who created and uphold the rules, show little sympathy for the millions of non-Democrats who want to exercise their right to vote in their primary but refuse to register as Democrats.

And that could be because they will continue to back only establishment candidates. Notably, Joe Biden is endorsed by the California official who directs this tragi-comic voting process, the secretary of state, Alex Padilla.

By contrast, in Colorado, another vote-by-mail state, the secretary of state simply ignores the DNC, sending every independent voter both a Republican and a Democratic party primary ballot – providing an easy way to vote as they choose.

Will California’s voters choose the Democratic candidate ... or will the DNC obstacle course bend the outcome?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/02/californias-rules-for-independent-party-voters-is-another-form-of-suppression
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Primaries are different
If parties were able to exercise some discretion in who qualifies for their nomination we wouldn't have Trump. If the cost of filtering out the raving reactionaries is that there's a bias toward the status quo, I'm not sure that's too steep a price.
--

Drew
New It's not the Party, it's the Secretary of State.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New On my voting information documents . . .
. . it specifically stated it was up to the parties. Probably the secretary of state does what the parties say to do.
New Exactly. Your SoS just follows orders, Colorado's (for instance) doesn't.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Re: Voter Suppression isn't just a Repo-thing. Et tu, California?
The rule in California is very simple. Each party may decide for itself whether voters who are not registered with the Party may vote for their candidates. It is not the State that makes this decision.

One thing this does is prevent one party from loading the vote of another party with the objective of biasing the election in their favor. The Russians would love to do that.
New Simple.
How did this happen? While Californians, including independent voters, vote overwhelmingly for Democrats in general elections, 5.3 million Golden state voters register “NPP”,: no party preference.

These 5 million independents legally have the right to vote in the Democratic primary, but the Democratic party has created an inscrutable obstacle course for them to do so, one that amounts to another type of voter suppression.

The problem begins with a postcard.

Last autumn, all 5 million NPP voters were mailed a postcard allowing them to request a ballot with the Democratic party presidential choices. However, as many states have learned, postcards with voter information largely look like junk mail and get thrown out.

If the independents don’t respond to the postcards, they get a ballot without presidential choices. But they have one more chance to vote for a candidate in the primaries: at the ballot box.

At the polling station, though, things remain confusing. According to rules set by the national Democratic party, the independent voters have to bring in their NPP ballot to the polling station and request to exchange it for a “crossover Democratic” ballot that lists the candidates.

However, if the voter fails to ask for the “crossover” ballot by its specific name, the poll worker is barred from suggesting it and they won’t receive it.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New happens in Alaska all the time, repos cross over into demo primaries to choose weak candidates
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New misprinted ballots != voter suppression




Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous.
- - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
New First time reader?
The ballot weren't misprinted. They lacked Presidential Candidates on purpose.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New And that's not voter "Suppression"




Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous.
- - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
     Voter Suppression isn't just a Repo-thing. Et tu, California? - (mmoffitt) - (10)
         Primaries are different - (drook) - (3)
             It's not the Party, it's the Secretary of State. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                 On my voting information documents . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                     Exactly. Your SoS just follows orders, Colorado's (for instance) doesn't. -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Re: Voter Suppression isn't just a Repo-thing. Et tu, California? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
             Simple. - (mmoffitt)
             happens in Alaska all the time, repos cross over into demo primaries to choose weak candidates -NT - (boxley)
         misprinted ballots != voter suppression -NT - (lincoln) - (2)
             First time reader? - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 And that's not voter "Suppression" - (lincoln)

Who's got a match?
168 ms