IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Databases Forum / Easy: Switch to...
Post #43,195
by CRConrad
6/22/02 2:00:34 PM
Reply
New Easy: Switch to...
...a [link|http://www.ibphoenix.com/|better database] that already has it.
   Christian R. Conrad
Microsoft is a true reflection of Bill Gates' personality - the sleaziest, most unethical, ugliest little rat's ass the world has seen unto this time. -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=42971|Andrew Grygus]
Post #43,293
by drewk
Picture of drewk
6/24/02 9:30:42 AM
Reply
New This *does* already have it
Well, in the next version it does. And if we're going to switch to something, I'd guess the next version of what we already have is more likely. And if we aren't even ready to do an upgrade ...
===
Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978|Andrew Grygus]
     How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (drewk) - (8) - June 21, 2002, 08:43:31 PM EDT
         Re: How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (kmself) - June 21, 2002, 10:36:45 PM EDT
         Re: How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (kmself) - June 21, 2002, 10:37:07 PM EDT
         AFAIK, you are outta luck -NT - (ben_tilly) - June 21, 2002, 11:20:45 PM EDT
         Easy: Switch to... - (CRConrad) - (1) - June 22, 2002, 02:00:34 PM EDT
             This *does* already have it - (drewk) - June 24, 2002, 09:30:42 AM EDT
         Re: How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - June 23, 2002, 01:50:50 PM EDT
             Thought of that already, I'm about to try the big nested IFs -NT - (drewk) - June 24, 2002, 09:31:57 AM EDT
         It is open source, add your own :-) -NT - (tablizer) - July 17, 2002, 10:13:07 PM EDT

GOPHERS, not GOLFERS!
40 ms