IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New refugees to sanctuary cities. Bad idea, expensive, petty
but why are the sanctuary cities not embracing the idea with open arms and assistance? NIMBY maybe?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Re: refugees to sanctuary cities. Bad idea, expensive, petty

White House officials have tried to pressure U.S. immigration authorities to release detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities” to retaliate against President Trump’s political adversaries, according to Department of Homeland Security officials and email messages reviewed by The Washington Post.

Trump administration officials have proposed transporting detained immigrants to sanctuary cities at least twice in the past six months — once in November, as a migrant caravan approached the U.S. southern border, and again in February, amid a standoff with Democrats over funding for Trump’s border wall.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco was among those the White House wanted to target, according to DHS officials. The administration also considered releasing detainees in other Democratic strongholds.




https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/white-house-proposed-releasing-immigrant-detainees-in-sanctuary-cities-targeting-political-foes/2019/04/11/72839bc8-5c68-11e9-9625-01d48d50ef75_story.html




Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous.
- - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
New point = missed
I was commenting more along these lines
http://news.trust.org/item/20190412195230-wi9c5
Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney responded in a statement: "While the Trump administration's proposal shows their disdain to basic human dignity, the City (Philadelphia) would be prepared to welcome these immigrants just as we have embraced our immigrant communities for decades.
and
n Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said in a statement "We would welcome these migrants with open arms, just as we welcomed Syrian refugees, just as we welcomed Puerto Ricans displaced by Hurricane Maria and just as we welcome Rohingya refugees fleeing genocide in Myanmar."
that is how you fight such actions
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Point = bullshit
box:
but why are the sanctuary cities not embracing the idea with open arms and assistance? NIMBY maybe?


Also box:
Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney responded in a statement: "While the Trump administration's proposal shows their disdain to basic human dignity, the City (Philadelphia) would be prepared to welcome these immigrants just as we have embraced our immigrant communities for decades.

and

n Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said in a statement "We would welcome these migrants with open arms, just as we welcomed Syrian refugees, just as we welcomed Puerto Ricans displaced by Hurricane Maria and just as we welcome Rohingya refugees fleeing genocide in Myanmar."


So the reason they're not embracing it is ... that they are embracing it?
--

Drew
New prior to my first post they were not, note Pelosi condemnation
second link shows they want to step up and help, what I was asking for in the first post.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
     refugees to sanctuary cities. Bad idea, expensive, petty - (boxley) - (4)
         Re: refugees to sanctuary cities. Bad idea, expensive, petty - (lincoln) - (3)
             point = missed - (boxley) - (2)
                 Point = bullshit - (drook) - (1)
                     prior to my first post they were not, note Pelosi condemnation - (boxley)

A:>_
42 ms