IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New U.S. stock ETFs avoided tax on more than $211 billion in gains last year' must be nice
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Maybe I don't read so good ...
I see everyone defending the legality of it, but I don't see a single explanation of why the loophole should exist in the first place.
--

Drew
New nixon era, that help?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New That's when they passed it ... but why
Or is "Nixon era" the entire explanation?
--

Drew
New the why
Enter the Nixon-era tax law. In 1969, Congress decreed that mutual funds can hand over appreciated stocks to withdrawing investors without triggering a tax bill. Lawmakers never explained why they blessed the industry with this unique break, but back then, it didn’t seem like much of a giveaway. Mutual funds rarely took advantage of it, because their investors preferred cash payouts.
I am going to assume that they didnt want to double dip on taxes, taxing the increase then taxing the income of the withdrawn investor. Nixon era was just to throw a time period and after a long time unintended consequences come into play.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New That's a horrible reason for a law
"There's not really a good reason for it, but it doesn't affect many people anyway so why not?"
--

Drew
New That's neat!
I no longer own any stocks directly. They're all in ETFs!
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

-- Isaac Asimov
     U.S. stock ETFs avoided tax on more than $211 billion in gains last year' must be nice - (boxley) - (6)
         Maybe I don't read so good ... - (drook) - (4)
             nixon era, that help? -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                 That's when they passed it ... but why - (drook) - (2)
                     the why - (boxley) - (1)
                         That's a horrible reason for a law - (drook)
         That's neat! - (a6l6e6x)

I took the liberty of fixing the punctuation.
73 ms