Pity that.. never shall 'We' See "all the evidence only: implicit" (not to be confused: 'complicit')
Because--for just two--some surely Is 'classified Top Sacred' (not always for obfuscatory reasons.) Thence: in order for others/States' prosecutors for Ex. jury consideration implies that material within the mass should Not be 'made public' for its admissibility must first be er, Judge-d on.
If we're rilly-Lucky we m i g h t ..get a sane, only semi-biased full precís of a litany of (so much circumstantial-evidence as Would persuade any honest jury) but sans the juiciest of the details as would be requisite for a jury to hear--but not the public/in advance, for all obv. reasons.
Natch: selling-short here is almost de rigeur, such as the dis-US is.. :-/
(Rick Steves' fine synopsis of Fascism in Europe/great old pix, flics: is re-showing just now.) Think: parallels :-//
If we're rilly-Lucky we m i g h t ..get a sane, only semi-biased full precís of a litany of (so much circumstantial-evidence as Would persuade any honest jury) but sans the juiciest of the details as would be requisite for a jury to hear--but not the public/in advance, for all obv. reasons.
Natch: selling-short here is almost de rigeur, such as the dis-US is.. :-/
(Rick Steves' fine synopsis of Fascism in Europe/great old pix, flics: is re-showing just now.) Think: parallels :-//