the summary of the mueller report is out

Post #428,069 by boxley 3/24/19 4:08:54 PM 3/24/19 4:10:03 PM Reply	the summary of the mueller report is out not much there, there. https://www.axios.com/mueller-report-bill-barr-investigation-congress-d106072d-0120-4b6b-8cef-cbd6915a0f60.html The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans including individuals associated with the Trump campaign joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with RuSsia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US. presidential election. As the report states: ?[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman Edited by boxley March 24, 2019, 04:10:03 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #428,070 by Another Scott 3/24/19 4:14:35 PM 3/24/19 4:14:35 PM Reply	"Knowingly" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in Barr's synopsis. He's also doing a tremendous amount of spinning on the next to the last page. Roughly: "There wasn't enough evidence to prove that Donnie conspired with Vlad, therefore we can't find that Donnie committed obstruction of the investigation of the conspiracy even though we saw him admit it multiple times in public..." I don't trust Barr's summary. We all need to see the *whole* Mueller report, including all the evidence before the grand juries. We'll see.... Cheers, Scott.
Post #428,072 by Ashton 3/24/19 4:54:10 PM 3/24/19 4:54:10 PM Reply	Pity that.. never shall 'We' See "all the evidence only: implicit" (not to be confused: 'complicit') Because--for just two--some surely Is 'classified Top Sacred' (not always for obfuscatory reasons.) Thence: in order for others/States' prosecutors for Ex. jury consideration implies that material within the mass should Not be 'made public' for its admissibility must first be er, Judge-d on. If we're rilly-Lucky we m i g h t ..get a sane, only semi-biased full precís of a litany of (so much circumstantial-evidence as Would persuade any honest jury) but sans the juiciest of the details as would be requisite for a jury to hear--but not the public/in advance, for all obv. reasons. Natch: selling-short here is almost de rigeur, such as the dis-US is.. :-/ (Rick Steves' fine synopsis of Fascism in Europe/great old pix, flics: is re-showing just now.) Think: parallels :-//
Post #428,074 by boxley 3/24/19 5:18:51 PM 3/24/19 5:18:51 PM Reply	it will be a trip to the USSC for breaking 6e rules with a dozen lawyers and 40+ investigators, reams of paper and Mueller doesnt have enough to indict not sure the effort is worth it. This will have to move out of the courts and into the political arena. "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Post #428,076 by drook 3/24/19 7:54:54 PM 3/24/19 7:54:54 PM Reply	Impeachment is always political, not court -- Drew
Post #428,078 by mmoffitt 3/25/19 9:34:53 AM 3/25/19 9:34:53 AM Reply	I hate to be the Naysayer in this, but ... Impeachment is not the solution. There is no solution. What's my rationale for saying that? This. bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again.
Post #428,082 by drook 3/25/19 6:59:51 PM 3/25/19 6:59:51 PM Reply	Doesn't matter what the national total is All that matters is the one third of senators facing election immediately after an impeachment vote, and the current mood in their states. -- Drew

Welcome to IWETHEY!