But, it contains a non-trivial flaw. The flaw is the presumption that there exists something akin to a conscience in a Republican politician. I know a lot of Republicans. I don't know any I would turn my back on.
A well reasoned editorial.
But, it contains a non-trivial flaw. The flaw is the presumption that there exists something akin to a conscience in a Republican politician. I know a lot of Republicans. I don't know any I would turn my back on. bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again. |
|
Doesn't require conscience, just enlightened self-interest
If he's still in office in another year, they'll have to walk a line between Trumpy enough to not get primaried, but sane enough to win the general. How wide that line is varies by state. -- Drew |
|
Self-interest of Republicans is not always what you'd expect.
I'd say these numbers are pretty well set in concrete. Trump, astonishingly, *still* enjoys a net-positive rating in AK, AL, AR, ID, IN, KY, LA, MO, MS, MT, ND, NE, OK, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, WV, and WY. If you're a Republican pol from one of those knuckle-dragging states and you want to keep your nose in the public trough, you're Trump 'till you die. bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again. |
|
No, that's exactly what I'd expect
Other than Texas, aren't all of those states among the smaller half in population? -- Drew |
|
Actually no.
AL, IN, LA, MO, SC, TN, and TX are all in the top half wrt population and states where Trump is underwater include NV, NM, IA, HI, NH, ME, DE and VT - all of which are in your bottom half wrt population. A state's population would appear to have little to no bearing on whether or not Trump has a net positive approval rating. You may have "expected" the states where he has a net positive approval rating to have such, but if you did so in consideration of State populations, you're reasoning was (dare I say it - once again) flawed. ;0) bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again. |