Post #425,601
9/22/18 5:20:27 PM
9/22/18 5:20:27 PM
|
And here’s the source
So Parker promulgated, perhaps directly (which makes her nakedly complicit) or at once-remove (which makes her willingly naïve and only secondarily complicit) the inept attempted ratfuckery of one Ed Whelan. Hoo-boy, is he dumb! Whelan’s original Twitter thread has been taken down, and in the past 36 hours he’s been frantically attempting to walk it back, but it would not surprise me if the middle school teacher in Georgia fingered (cough) by Whalen hasn’t found a voicemail message along the lines of “Mr. Garrett? My name is Michael Avenatti. You may have heard of me. Listen, I sometimes do work on a contingent basis…” Seen elsewhere: “They’re trying to circle the wagons, but the wheels keep coming off.” cordially,
|
Post #425,603
9/22/18 6:01:24 PM
9/22/18 6:01:24 PM
|
snorting coke off of a hookers ass didnt stop shrub from two terms
so if a drunken frat boy acted like one 36 years ago unless there is more I wouls say he gets confirmed anyway. Actually if trump really was a devious ratfucker, he could say fine, you dont want kavanaugh? Here is someone already vetted. Stuff Jeff Sessions in the slot ram the vote thru and then he has a clear shot at Rosenstein. "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #425,604
9/22/18 6:31:19 PM
9/22/18 6:31:19 PM
|
less that “a drunken frat boy acted like one 36 years ago”…
than that he’s lying his ass off about it today. Publicly. Even to his handlers. As Charles Pierce has observed, Here’s the thing about Categorical Denials. They push all your chips to the center of the table. If you're mistaken, or you’ve forgotten, or you did it but you were too sockless hammered to recall the events, you’re just as done as if you were flat-out lying about the whole matter. Certainly, if you’re trying to be a Supreme Court justice, you better hope there isn’t evidence out there that you’ve somehow misplaced in your memory, because peddling untruths in public, and before the Senate, and under oath, is a guaranteed way back to your old job. So, if the woman in question steps up, bravely, and describes in detail what she remembers about the night in question, you can suddenly realize that there isn’t quite as much limb under your feet as you thought there was. But I wouldn’t imagine you can parse that, as advanced as your malignant cerebral trollinoma has become.
|
Post #425,605
9/22/18 6:42:20 PM
9/22/18 6:42:20 PM
|
if he did it once chances are he did it again, get those folks to come forward.
things like that dont exist in a vacuum. "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #425,606
9/22/18 7:25:45 PM
9/22/18 7:25:45 PM
|
How many more?
What's the exact number of additional accusers that will convince the Republicans that he did it, but not so many that it's evidence of a deep state conspiracy?
|
Post #425,610
9/22/18 9:18:39 PM
9/22/18 9:22:46 PM
|
republicans? Half of them or more don't think doing that is particularly wrong adding example
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Edited by boxley
Sept. 22, 2018, 09:22:46 PM EDT
|
Post #425,614
9/22/18 10:39:41 PM
9/22/18 10:39:41 PM
|
If they don't care, what's the incentive for anyone else to step forward and take on that hassle?
|
Post #425,608
9/22/18 7:46:45 PM
9/22/18 7:46:45 PM
|
yup
Step right up! Getcher online death threats right here!
|
Post #425,609
9/22/18 7:49:51 PM
9/22/18 7:49:51 PM
|
"things like that don’t exist in a vacuum"
So, O.J. is accused of murdering a couple of people. Are there any other people he killed? Things like that don’t exist in a vacuum.
|
Post #425,611
9/22/18 9:20:17 PM
9/22/18 9:20:17 PM
|
murder is the exception rather than the rule.
Murderers are usually good prospects to becoming good citizens after their release as the person that pissed them off is dead now. "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
