npr Forum does Friday's Monsanto/Glycophosphates trial (re-runs later for ∆ time-zones)
In this problem of "prove a [-]" and such ambiguities as "non-smoking lung cancer victims" ... ...
A VP of Monsanto gave his comments, as did various folk; issues arising:
A) 'Corporate' stats -vs- say, non-aligned? (describing say, "why megadoses numbers re large Rat populations are required" to apply to 1/100 or 1/1000 outliers you also want to be offed (or in this case: be protected). This as applies to populations of 109 and like that.
B) as to Agencies involved (worldwide) a good analysis of the difference between RISK-assessment -vs- HAZARD-assessment, aka how STRONG is the risk?? of using this $T-generating 'product' (in a variety of exposure-kinds/daily basis or other, overexposure and alt-modes.)
.
.
So, Of Course they will appeal ... but [moi opinion] surely That outcome shall heavily depend upon a JURY with sufficient STAT-props to properly weigh the above guaranteed ambiguities (so susceptible of patent legalese-insertion into scientific analyses of any kind [/]. (Both these categories also demand research into common legalese "meanings" -vs- their intended usage, when author is not entirely My-$$$-driven™
Look it all Up if you like $$$-Games -vs- seeking-really: Da Truff and noting how malleable Is the human er, 'monkey-brain' to various kinds of suasion.
Carrion.. fuck, it's just Everywhere now.
A VP of Monsanto gave his comments, as did various folk; issues arising:
A) 'Corporate' stats -vs- say, non-aligned? (describing say, "why megadoses numbers re large Rat populations are required" to apply to 1/100 or 1/1000 outliers you also want to be offed (or in this case: be protected). This as applies to populations of 109 and like that.
B) as to Agencies involved (worldwide) a good analysis of the difference between RISK-assessment -vs- HAZARD-assessment, aka how STRONG is the risk?? of using this $T-generating 'product' (in a variety of exposure-kinds/daily basis or other, overexposure and alt-modes.)
.
.
So, Of Course they will appeal ... but [moi opinion] surely That outcome shall heavily depend upon a JURY with sufficient STAT-props to properly weigh the above guaranteed ambiguities (so susceptible of patent legalese-insertion into scientific analyses of any kind [/]. (Both these categories also demand research into common legalese "meanings" -vs- their intended usage, when author is not entirely My-$$$-driven™
Look it all Up if you like $$$-Games -vs- seeking-really: Da Truff and noting how malleable Is the human er, 'monkey-brain' to various kinds of suasion.
Carrion.. fuck, it's just Everywhere now.
